Superstar Pamamahala

Sign this petition NOW to stand against Corruption; Governmental, Legal and Police Misconduct; White Collar Crime; Unfair Employment and Business Practices; Consumer Fraud; and show YOUR SUPPORT for Government Transparency; Accountability; Civic Reform; Enforcing Ethical Standards; Civil Rights and Religious Freedom!

Petition To The Honorables President Barack Hussein Obama II and United States Attorney General Eric Himpton Holder, Jr.

Sa pamamagitan ng pag-type ng iyong pangalan dito mo ay affixing ng ang IYONG Signature ang petisyon na ito (Kinakailangan):

Sino ang gusto ninyong Magpadala ng iyong petisyon Upang? Mangyaring pumili ng isa.
The Honorable President Barack Hussein Obama II or The Honorable Attorney General Eric Himpton Holder, Jr.? (required)

The Honorable President Barack Hussein Obama II The Honorable Attorney General Eric Himpton Holder, Jr.

From: Your Name (required)

City You Live In (required)

State You Live In (required)

Your Zip Code (required)

Ang iyong Email (kinakailangan)

Todays Date (required)

I Want to Submit This Petition.

To: The Honorable President Barack Hussein Obama II
The White House
1600 Pennsylvania Avenue
Washington, DC 20500

The Honorable Mr. Eric Himpton Holder, Jr.
United States Attorney General
United States Department of Justice
Washington, DC 20500

cc: UN Secy Gen Ban Ki-Moon, High Commissioner for Human Rights Ms. Navanethem Pillay, President of the United Nations Human Rights Council Mr. Martin Ihoeghian Uhomoibhi, The United States Senate and House Judiciary Committees, and The Congressional Black Caucus

The Honorables President Barack Hussein Obama II and Attorney General Eric Himpton Holder, Jr.:

I, THE UNDERSIGNED, Pursuant to the spirit of the United States Constitution and free democracy, as registered and qualified citizens and electors of the United States of America, am writing you with a sense of grave concern and outrage to petition you and request your personal and immediate intervention to put an end to an egregious injustice in the cases of Abdul-Jalil al-Hakim v. CSAA, Alameda County Case No. 811337-3 and Abdul-Jalil al-Hakim v. RESCUE INDUSTRIES, INC.,Case No. 821885-2.

Sinuman na kanino ay narinig ang tungkol sa kasong ito, basahin ang mga file ang kaso, balita ulat, tiningnan video o impormasyon na nakapaloob at isampa ang kaso kabilang ang mga salawal at mga opinyon ng mga korte, alam na ang parehong Abdul-Jalil al-Hakim ng pagsubok ay sinubukan at adjudicated sa gitna katiwalian, ng kagilalasan at isterismo na, sa core nito, constituted isang lahi siklab ng galit at pag-uusig ng relihiyon. Indicting salita mula sa Hukom habang sa hukuman sa parehong mga kaso, sa kanilang sarili, point sa kapootang panlahi, bias at pinsala kahit na sa loob ng Courtroom.

Tumawag ako sa inyo para sa lunas ng ito 13 taon na kasaysayan ng mga garapal na paglabag ng Estados batas Unidos konstitusyonal at internasyonal na mga pamantayan ng hustisya bilang dokumentado sa pamamagitan ng maraming mga legal na grupo sa buong mundo at para sa Kagawaran ng Katarungan na agad umpisahan ang isang sibil mga karapatan ng imbestigasyon upang suriin ang mga maraming halimbawa ng kapansin-pansin at rasista panghukuman, prosecutorial, abogado, at corporate magluko dating pabalik sa orihinal na pagsubok Industriya iligtas noong 2003 at patuloy sa pamamagitan ng CSAA pagsubok na nagtatapos sa 2008 sa kasalukuyang pagkahinto ng Estado ng California Appeals at kataas-taasang hukuman. Ang batas ng mga limitasyon ay hindi dapat maging isang kadahilanan sa kasong ito bilang may malakas na katibayan ng isang patuloy na sabwatan upang tanggihan Abdul-Jalil kanyang mga konstitusyon karapatan.

Ang al-Hakim sa v CSAA, at iligtas ang mga Industriya kaso, parehong higit sa $ 20 milyong, 13 taon; mga palatutol legal na aksyon; na may pinakamalaking file ng kaso sa kasaysayan ng Alameda County Superior Court, na may higit sa 70 mga kahon file ng pleadings; sa paglipas ng 120 galaw at tugon; al-Hakim ay may higit sa 300 exhibits tugaygayan; mahigit sa 5,000 mga pahina ng exhibits; 3,000 mga pahina ng mga dokumento para sa pagsubok pakli argument; 20 ekspertong testigo; 77 iba pang mga saksi; higit sa 100 mga pahina ng mga tagubilin hurado; sa pagkawala ng karapatan ay isampa laban sa bawat Judge para sa maraming mga singil mula sa panghukuman magluko sa katiwalian, na kung saan ang bawat hukom sa kasong ito ay admitido error, nakatuon perjury, recused kanilang sarili, o lahat ng tatlong!

Abdul-Jalil al-Hakim, isang napakahusay na kilala, matagumpay na negosyo manager, tagagawa, at Muslim ng katutubong Aprikano-Amerikano na na pinagbuhatan mula sa Oakland, California, isampa sa isang Pederal Reklamo sa Estados Unidos Attorney General, Department of Justice, ng isang krimen ng poot ng Islamophobia at ang sinpobya nakatuon laban sa kanya ni Judge David C. Lee sa panahon ng Industriya ng pagsubok iligtas sa Superior Court of Alameda County, California.

This effort is to continue moving this investigation forward with charges of criminal extrinsic fraud upon the court of the State of California, spoliation of evidence, and the doctrine “unclean hands” against defendants/hostile intervener AAA Insurance; Ron Cook and the law firm of WILLOUGHBY, STUART & BENING; defense counsel Steve Barber and the law firm of Ropers Majeski; and Oakland City Attorney John Russo, Mark Morodomi, Randy Hall, Janie Wong, Anita Hong, Sophia Li, Demetruis Shelton, Elizabeth Allen, Erica Harrold, Michele Abney, Eliada Perez, former Oakland and current San Leandro City Attorney Jayne Williams and former Oakland City employee Pat Smith provided the case file to defendants Stephan Barber and Ron Cook for nearly a year and failed to notify the court of this unpardonable illegal breach in the chain of custody of the file, willful and intentional fabrication and authoring false evidence.

The Federal Complaint, drafted and filed by Abdul-Jalil in pro per, has broad based support from Democrats and Republicans, was submitted by Congresswoman Barbara Lee with the offices of Congressmen John Conyers, and Charles Rangel, has been review by several legal experts, with advocacy by former Republican Senator JC Watts, a client of al-Hakim's.

The Federal Complaint addressed the concern that a Superior Court Judges' conduct rose to the level of consideration for a Federal Crime and a Civil Rights violation because the bench upon which the judge rules is “under the color of law” and certainly the violation of anyone's civil rights is a federal crime. “Muslims, just as any other group, can not be afraid to speak up when their rights have been abridged. If one does not speak up, then the transgressions goes unreported and the perpetrator goes on to harm again unchecked, it does not matter whom the transgressor is” said al-Hakim.

Ang reklamo, marahil mas mahalaga, hindi lamang nang masaya hiniling Friedlander, Chief ng Civil Karapatan ng Division, upang gumawa ng isang pagsisiyasat ng isang panghukuman poot ng krimen, ngunit din ng maraming iba pang mga karapatan bilang mamamayan at mga angkop na proseso ng paglabag ng panghukuman at prosecutorial magluko, at abugado panlabas pandaraya sa hukuman at batas na direkta sa kanilang sarili ang bagay na nagreklamo. JC Watts sa humihingi "Ano ang dapat na terorista na gawa sa Rusya ay may sa gawin sa ang pabaya karumihan ng isang bahay sa Amerika?" Posed ang argument na dapat na pagsasaalang-alang ng at isang tugon sa maraming mga isyu sa reklamo.

Pagkatapos ng pagsusuri sa USAG Office, ang kaso ay isipan ng bilang kaya kapansin-pansin na kahit na kasumpa-sumpa sa Bradley Schlozman, kanino ay ngayon fired at nakaharap Pederal na sakdal sa natatalaga abogado General Alberto Gonzalez para sa pag-alis ng Demokratikong abogado mula sa US abogado Generals tanggapan sa buong bansa, na ipinadala al-Hakim ng isang sulat na nagre-refer na ang bagay (dahil ng hurisdiksiyunal limitasyon) sa California State Attorney General, California State Bar Association, ang California Estado Panghukuman Konseho, at California Estado Insurance commissioner para sa pagsisiyasat at pag-uusig. At ito ay republikano Hukom at abogado ng pagiging nagreklamo ng!

Ngunit na hindi maaaring mangyari. California Attorney General at kandidato para sa Gobernador, Jerry Brown, na responsable para sa pagdala ang pagsisiyasat ng Oakland City Attorney John Russo, dating Oakland at kasalukuyang San Leandro City Abugado Jayne Williams, ang dating Distrito Abugado Tom Orloff, kasalukuyang District Attorney Nancy E. O'Malley , Alameda County Superior Court, ang Estado Appeals at mga hukom ng kataas-taasang hukuman, at iba't ibang mga corporate defendants sa kasong ito ay sa kanyang sarili pagtatanggol ng ilang ng ang mga kriminal at sumasaklaw sa parehong katiwalian siya ay dapat na sinisiyasat at prosecuting!

California Attorney General Jerry Brown, Oakland City Attorney John Russo, dating Oakland at kasalukuyang San Leandro City Abugado Jayne Williams, ang dating Distrito Abugado Tom Orloff, at kasalukuyang Abugado ng Distrito Nancy E. O'Malley, ang lahat ng paghahabol na ang mga proponents ng Government Transparency, pananagutan at Civic reporma at taong dumudulot ng kanyang mga kalakal ang kanilang mga pangako ng kampanya at mga kabutihan sa mga palabas sa TV at radyo, sa mga video, sa kanilang mga website, sa maraming mga release pindutin at sa nanggagaling mga artikulo ng balita. Upang makakaapekto sa mga matayog na mga pangako sa kampanya, lahat ng mga ito ay paraded ng Civic reporma sa paglilinis up Gobyerno at Batas sa Pagpapatupad naglalayong sa pagpapanumbalik ng pampublikong pagtitiwala sa pamahalaan, pagpapanatili ng pinakamurang wasto Pamantayan, "Whistleblower ng" Program, Legal Serbisyo naglalayong sa pagpapabuti ng kondisyon para sa mga ang mga mahihirap, pinasimulan paghahabla batas laban sa mga indibidwal at korporasyon di-umano'y nagiging sanhi ng pinsala sa ang pampublikong at kapaligiran, nakatatanda pang-aabuso, homeowner at mga karapatan ng nangungupahan, ang foreclosure at pagbabangko krisis, at marahas na krimen.

Sila fashion kanilang sarili bilang mga independiyenteng watchdogs at gatekeepers para sa mga tao, pakikipaglaban ng pamahalaan at pulis magluko at katiwalian, krimen, nepotismo, hindi patas na trabaho kasanayan, marahas na gangs, consumer pandaraya, hindi patas na negosyo kasanayan, dysfunctional Kalusugan California ng Care System, kampanya pagsisiwalat at maglolobi gawain.

Ayon sa Web site ng Russo, Real Oakland Administrative reporma (umungal) ay dinisenyo upang "gawing mas maipaliwanag ang lungsod pamahalaan, mas malinaw at mas epektibo."

Gayunman, ang isang mas malapit inspeksyon ay nagpapakita na ito ay hindi hihigit sa guwang salita sa tabing kanilang Nabigong Kampanya pangako; ang broker Para sa White tubong Crime; tagapagtaguyod ng kapootang panlahi, pagkapanatiko, Selective pag-uusig at White Class Priviledge!

Attorney General Jerry Brown, Oakland City Attorney John Russo, dating Oakland at kasalukuyang San Leandro City Abugado Jayne Williams, ang dating Distrito Abugado Tom Orloff, at kasalukuyang Abugado ng Distrito Nancy E. O'Malley ng corporate lawsuits halaga ang kanilang mga sarili sa kaunti pa kaysa sa parehong "shakedown "tutulan nila kapag sila ay sued.When sila tumira ng mga mapagpanggap na mga paghahabla nila ipaalam ang corporate sala off the hook para sa mga tunay na pagkalaki-laki na milyon-milyong dolyar sa mga bayad, mga multa, parusa, pagbabayad-pinsala, parusa, mga gastos, ang aktwal na at nagpapahirap pinsala at ang mga nalikom ay HINDI pumunta sa ang biktima ng mga corporate crooks, Ang MGA! Dagdag dito, ang mga corporate crooks ay HINDI na ipinadala sa bilangguan para sa kanilang mga White tubong krimen, pa pinaka minorya, mga imigrante, o relihiyon minorya violators ay ipinadala sa bilangguan na may maximum na pangungusap para sa di-umano'y mga menor de edad na paglabag. Saan ang katumbas ng pagpapatupad, katarungan at kahit kamay na pag-uusig ng mga di-umano'y krimen? Bakit Brown, Russo, Williams, Orloff, at O'Malley kinakapatid na ang maliwanag na pumipili ng pag-uusig at paglilitis hatiin sa pamamagitan ng lahi, pera, klase, bansa sex, ng pinagmulan, relihiyon? pampublikong ay raped sa pamamagitan ng mga sleight-of-kamay na kriminal na paglilitis taktika ng mga corporate crooks, Brown, Russo, Williams, Orloff, at O'Malley habang pagiging iligaw sa paniniwalang na ang mga ito ay ang "Protectors ng Ang Public Trust! "bilang Russo estado" na ito ay trabaho ng pamahalaan upang magsagawa ang mga tao ng negosyo sa ngalan ng mga tao, nananagot sa mga tao, at sa buong view ng mga tao. "

Oakland City Attorney John Russo at dating Oakland at kasalukuyang San Leandro City Abugado Jayne Williams kinatha ebidensiya at nakatanim na katibayan na nababatay sa mga defendants sa kaso ang mga file.

al-Hakim ay kamakailan din ginawa malinaw, hindi masasagot, na naitatag "paninigarilyo gun" na katibayan ng ang patuloy na maingay ilegal na gawain ng Oakland City Attorney John Russo, dating Oakland at kasalukuyang San Leandro City Abugado Jayne Williams, dating empleyado ng Oakland City Pat Smith, pagtatanggol counsel Stephan Barber at Ron Cook Akusado sa CSAA at ang mga kalakip na araro iligtas kaso na Oakland City Attorney John Russo at Opisina ng Abugado ng Lunsod ay nakatuon panlabas pandaraya, pandaraya sa ANG ESTADO ng suhol, AT ang paghingi NG PERJURIOUS na patotoo, na nagbibigay ng paglilitis file ng kaso at ebidensiya SA DEFENDANTS, pang-aagaw NG katibayan, FABRICATING katibayan at PLANTING kinatha ebidensiya SA sa mga file ng kaso ng paglilitis, sinusubukang SA linlangin ANG MGA SA SUPPORT NG mga paglilitis TEORYA DEFENDANTS, paninirang-puri panlilinlang sa pamamagitan ng pagbigay ng mga file ng kaso sa Stephan Barber Akusado at iba pa ng law firm Ropers, Majeski , at Ronald J. Cook, Randy Willoughby, Alex Stuart, Bradley Bening at iba ng Willoughby ng law firm, Stuart & Bening para sa halos isang taon; pagkatapos ay malinaw na constructed mapanlinlang na gawa-gawa na ebidensiya noong 1999 at nakatanim na katibayan na nababatay sa mga defendants sa mga file anim na taon PAGKATAPOS ang kaso ay sarado; nakatuon sa pang-aagaw ng natitirang ng ebidensiya sa hukuman ang mga file mula sa 1991; at fostered saksi patotoo na batay sa mga ito nakatanim na katibayan sa ang al-Hakim v CSAA at ang kalakip na iligtas ng araro kaso na ay nilikha sa pamamagitan ng panlabas na pandaraya sa kasamang patotoo procured sa pamamagitan admitido suborned at solicited perjurious gawain ng John Russo at iba pa, sila ay nakatuon sa pagkilos upang sirain ang paglilitis ng mga legal na kaso al-Hakim ay; sila nakatuon sa pagkilos sa coverup kanilang mga labag sa batas na kilos; sila nakatuon, aided at abetted ito kriminal na aktibidad ito hindi mapatatawad paglabag sa kadena ng pag-iingat ng hukuman ang mga file upang mapaunlakan ang mga defendants diskarte paglilitis sa parehong ng ang CSAA at ang mga kalakip na iligtas araro kaso.

John Russo, Mark Morodomi, Randy Hall, Janie Wong, Anita Hong, Sophia Li, Demetruis Shelton, Elizabeth Allen, Erica Harrold, Michele Abney, Eliada Perez, and former Oakland and current San Leandro City Attorney Jayne Williams and former Oakland City employee Pat Smith, defendants Stephan Barber and Ron Cook have all failed and refused to provide the information sought by al-Hakim, and further failed and refused to appear under court ordered subpoena for deposition testimony twice and under court ordered subpoena for trial testimony and have caused al-Hakim and family to be forced from their $1 million plus home and office, foreclosed from an over $20 million law suit, and multi million business for 13 years thru the City Attorneys' violation of the business and professional codes, extrinsic fraud, subornation of perjurious testimony, committing these acts under the color of law with unclean hands, and should be prosecuted to the full extent of the law.

John Russo, dating Oakland at kasalukuyang San Leandro City Abugado Jayne Williams at ang Abugado ng Oakland City office staffs 'kriminal na paglabag ng ang Civil Code ng Negosyo, at propesyon Code, ang mga Batas ng Professional Asal, at ang California Cannons strikes sa puso ng al- Hakim pangunahing sibil at karapatang pantao, at ng karapatan sa angkop na proseso sa ilalim ng batas na garantisadong ng Estados Unidos Konstitusyon susog at ang California Konstitusyon. Ang mga pagkilos na ito ay kuwalipikado bilang isang poot Crime ilalim ang Unruh Karapatan sa Batas, ang Ralph Civil Karapatan sa Batas at ang Bane Act, habang ang mga ito ay malinaw na krimen ng relihiyon pagkapanatiko at intoleransiya na, bilang tulad, ang pag-uugali na ito ay tumaas sa antas ng pagsasaalang-alang para sa isang Federal Crime at isang Civil Karapatan ng paglabag dahil ang Opisina ng Abugado ng Lunsod ay nagpapatakbo ng "sa ilalim ng kulay ng batas" at tiyak na ang mga paglabag ng mga karapatan bilang mamamayan sinuman ay isang pederal na krimen. Ang pag-agaw ng al-Hakim sibil, tao at dahil karapatan ng proseso sa pamamagitan ng pagpapatupad ng batas ng katawan ng mga opisina ng Lunsod sa abogado ng Oakland tumaas sa antas ng kriminal na aktibidad at "maling pangangasiwa ng mga lokal at pederal na opisyal ng pagpapatupad ng batas na ito ay. Demand ng mga kriminal na mga aksyon sa pamamagitan ng Russo at ang kanyang mga tauhan nila ay ibinigay hukuman iniutos ng subpoena upang tumestigo.

Aksyon laban sa dating Alameda County District Attorney Tom Orloff, kasalukuyang District Attorney Nancy E. O'Malley, at ang Alameda County ng Kagawaran ng mga Serbisyo ng Suporta ng Bata (ACDCSS)

al-Hakim had to file an action against former District Attorney Tom Orloff and the Alameda County District Attorney's (DA) and the Alameda County Department of Child Support Services (ACDCSS) because for over 15 years they repeatedly failed and refused to enforce the courts own orders for the fair and proper application and accounting of payments al-Hakim made in trust to the DA in their fiduciary capacity for the minor al-Hakim child depriving al-Hakim and the minor child of over $2,000 of monies paid. In doing so, the DA creating a “mythical” arrearage and open account in al-Hakim's name and on his behalf owed to the minor child, and when al-Hakim refused to pay their fraud as he does to this day, then illegally charged al-Hakim with the crime of violating the child support statute for nonpayment, reporting the alleged violation to the State of California for Collection and the State Department of Motor Vehicles for suspension of his driving privilege for nonpayment and illegally tossing al-Hakim into “debtors prison” , suspending his drivers license, revoking his passport, and ruining his multi-million credit. ACDCSS actions and claimed “right” to perform in this manner are not contained in any State or Federal statute, regulation, or other legislative act and therefore, do not have the force of law and renders it constitutionally infirm and no court officer can merely “grant” a ruling in their favor to cover getting caught having done so.

State of California Attorney General Jerry Brown and Candidate for Governor Substitutes In
On January 22, 2008 California Attorney General Jerry Brown and the Office of The Attorney General of The State of California substituted in as attorney of record in this case for the Alameda County Department of Child Support Services allegedly “In The Interest of Justice” . What justice is there when he then defended, concealed and thereby further complicitly committed the admitted willful and intentional extrinsic fraud upon the State, al-Hakim and his family, and the court; prosecutorial misconduct; willful and malicious prosecution; misconduct; conflict of interest; obstruction of justice; denial of due process under the law; willful and intentional fabrication and authoring false evidence; misstating and mischaracterizing evidence; misrepresentation and concealment of material facts with knowledge of the truth with the intent to induce the court's act or reliance; harassment; and intimidation committed by former District Attorney Tom Orloff, current DA's Nancy E. O'Malley, Maureen Lenahan, Valgeria Harvey, counselors L. Lavagetto, Ms. K. Pendergrass, Ms. Adler, Kris Ferre, and accountant Mr. Lovelady and others unnamed in the DA's office; as well as Commissioner Glenn Oleon's abuse of discretion, willful misconduct, conduct prejudicial, illegal ex-parte communications and bias that resulted in error.

Sa panahon ng pag-apila ng al-Hakim ay sapilitang upang maghain ng mosyon laban Jerry Brown sa pagpapalaki ng mga rekord ng hukuman upang isama ang mga mahalagang mga transcript ng pagdinig na ang da admitido sila ay ginulangan al-Hakim pamilya. Sa kabila ng katotohanan na al-Hakim ay binayaran para sa transcript ng maaga, tulad ng sa mga galaw na "tinanggihan" dahil ang apila hukuman ay hindi patakaran sa mga ito sa isang napapanahong paraan, tumanggi din ito sa pagpapalaki sa rekord sa apela kapag ito ay i-clear na ang katibayan na ang magiging mapanganib sa Estado at defendants Alameda County ng Kagawaran ng mga Serbisyo ng Suporta ng Bata (ACDCSS) at ang Alameda County District Attorney (da). Ang Appeals Court ay pagpapasya upang magsagawa ng karagdagang ebidensiya sa apila (Code Civ. Proc., § 909.) Kung saan ang proffered ebidensiya nagpapakita na ang bagay ay lumiliko sa katibayan tendered.

Alameda County Superior Court Judge Jon Tigar
Alameda County Judge Jon Tigar, nahahalata liglig at pagbulong-bulong, ay pinagdudusahan isang kaisipan meltdown sa hukuman bilang admitido siya sa bukas na hukuman kapansin-pansin ang Hamon ikapitong Dahilan, isang masakit sa higit sa 750 pahina ng sakdal, nang walang pagbabasa ito sandali pagkatapos na ito ay nai-file at nagsilbi sa kanya sa pamamagitan ng al-Hakim sa kuwarto ng hukuman sa Nobyembre 20, 2008!!

Matapos ang tungkol sa 5 minuto ng pagiging hindi na dumating sa anumang bagay, ang Tigar nagsisimula sa meltdown babbling at pagbulong-bulong na "al-Hakim ay sinabi na ang lahat ng mga paratang sa hamon na ito ay ang parehong bilang ang nakaraang mga bago, na siya ay hindi gusto mong pumunta sa pamamagitan ng ibang hamon, siya ay nais na gumawa ng kapasiyahan sa ang galaw, at "bagaman ang apila hukuman ay hindi maaaring sumang-ayon, na siya ay kitang-kita ang hamon nang hindi pagbasa ito", al-Hakim ay maaaring magsampa ng isang sulat na kung siya gustong at kung ang hukuman ng apila ay sumang-ayon , pagkatapos al-Hakim ay makakuha ng isa pang pagdinig ". Siya pagkatapos estado na ang order ay magagamit pagkatapos ng pagdinig.

Siya pagkatapos ay iwasan, ang nabigo at tumanggi sa napapanahong file at maghatid ng isang nakasulat na sagot sa Hamon Para sa Dahilan at nagpatuloy sa tuntunin sa ang bagay na narinig na sandali at tinanggihan pareho al-Hakim ng galaw upang lisanin ang pangungulila Order ng Abril 7, 2008 at Pagsubok Nagtatapos Ang minuto Order ng Abril 9, 2008 ng walang prinsipyo Judge Tigar.

Hukom Jon Tigar iniurong kritikal saksi patotoo ng Ang kagalang-galang na Judge Leo Dorado dahil siya at Defense ng Counsel / Defendants Stephan Barber at iba ng ang Ropers ng law firm, Majeski, pati na rin Ronald J. Cook, Randy Willoughby, Alex Stuart, Bradley Bening at iba pa ng Willoughby ng law firm, Stuart & Bening, feared al-Hakim ay galugarin ang katiwalian, sabwatan, at masamang pamamahala ng mga Hukom at mga abogado na naiulat sa US Attorney General sa al-Hakim kaso!

Further, Tigar aborted the testimony of Co-Defense Counsel/Defendant Ron Cook yet al-Hakim still manage to get over 20 critical admissions of undeniable guilt of Stephan Barber and others of the law firm Ropers, Majeski, and Cook, Randy Willoughby, Alex Stuart, Bradley Bening. Tigar also libeled testimony and authored perjurious, deceptive, and fraudulent bereavement and trial ending orders to destroy the litigation of al-Hakim's legal case!

Judge Tigar's actions of "deliberate judicial dishonesty" are not only willfully and intentionally illegal, harmful, dangerous, libelous, perjurious, deceptive and fraudulent in violation of al-Hakim's civil and human rights and right to due process: they are insolent, offensive, insulting, and impugn the integrity of the court and he did this IN SUPPORT of the DEFENDANTS LITIGATION THEORY whom served as his own legal counsel in this very same case!

There is an infinite amount of evidence herein to attest to Tigar's lying under oath and perjury, misrepresentations, deceit, dishonesty, willful and prejudicial misconduct, bad faith, incompetence, conflicts of interest, bias, calling al-Hakim a liar without any substantiation or justification; instructing al-Hakim not to mention Tigar's perjury or to speak his own truth; threatened retaliation to charge him with contempt when al-Hakim refused to back off his charges of the judges perjury, deceit; entitling orders for his convenience to deny them and avoid appellate review; entitling orders for his convenience to deny them and issues sanctions; willfully and intentionally withholding filing and serving orders (possibly backdating orders) then acted on the orders after the applicable deadlines for al-Hakim to legally and properly respond, thus forcing al-Hakim to forfeit his civil rights and right to due process; irresponsible failure as a judge to read, interpret, and apply the applicable laws, accusing al-Hakim of attacking judges in open court, has attacked other parties in open court while dressed in civilian clothes yet performing his duties as a judge and his honest refusal to recuse “goes beyond mere negligence” ; this conduct falls into the category of willful misconduct by a judge as arising out of conduct which is done in bad faith and conduct prejudicial to the administration of justice that brings the judicial office into disrepute. The deception practiced by Judge Tigar during these events, as well as his specious actions before al-Hakim on every occasion, are equally antithetical to, and inherently incompatible with, his duties to uphold the law and the search for truth, reflects a gross lack of judicial temperament and a purpose other than the faithful discharge of judicial duty, and is at minimum improper action.

al-Hakim presents clear, uncontroverted, unopposed, uncontested, corroborated proof Tigar has written, signed and submitted willfully perjurious, deceptive and fraudulent orders in attempting to deceive the public in support of his rulings; threatened, and belittled al-Hakim; made improper references of al-Hakim's character and as being untruthful; coupled with his perjury regarding the discovery matters and categorical denial of every discovery issue raised before him by al-Hakim reflected a prejudgment of al-Hakim's discovery claims, his case and a lack of impartiality; responded to his disqualification by his failure and refusal to timely filing an answer; doing so 8 days later only after al-Hakim had requested the written answer at least six times; filing an answer 8 days later only after al-Hakim contested his continued sitting in the case and indicated his intent to file an appeal for same; stating al-Hakim “attacks judges” in his answer without any explanation; calling al-Hakim a liar in his answer without any substance; publicly criticizing al-Hakim in court on the record; repeatedly lied under oath; made knowingly false statements in an effort to demean, humiliate and provoke plaintiff while lying under oath and perjury; dishonesty; fraudulent deception; calumny deceit; willful and prejudicial misconduct; abuse of discretion; negligence; bias; prejudice; misrepresentation; incompetence; conflict of interest; bad faith; collusion; denial of due process; obstruction of justice; racism; bigotry; has exhibited, expressed and shown a fixed opinion of al-Hakim; displayed favoritism towards the defendants; made false accusations; harassed al-Hakim; has willfully, deceitfully and recklessly indulged in a series of offensive acts and statements against plaintiff and has displayed disdain, malice, and a mental attitude or disposition toward al-Hakim that prohibits the right to a fair hearing or trial; failed and refused to respond to the allegations contained in the challenges for cause; conduct prejudicial; and advocated a judicial imprimatur of the defense's position were grounds for disqualification under Code Civ. Proc. on the ground of misconduct, prejudicial misconduct, bias, and prejudice in violations of Code Civ. Proc., Business and Professions Codes, the Rules of Professional Conduct, the California Const., the California Code of Judicial Ethics Canons that violates al-Hakim's fundamental civil rights and due process under the law guaranteed by the United States Constitution and as applicable to the State of California Constitution as a "miscarriage of justice." Judge Tigar's persistent willful misconduct, bad faith, mistreatment, promised retaliation and “atmosphere of unfairness” determines that there is a high probability he will continue his unethical behavior if he were to continue in a judicial capacity in the future.

California Appeals Court
al-Hakim has feared, and quite correctly so, that as in the past, this California Appeals Court Division lead by Appellate Judges Barbara Jones, James Richman, and Henry Needham with cover and sanctuary provide by Ronald M. George of The California Supreme Court, and court administrators Mary Quilez and Clerk Diana Herbert had engaged in and were directly responsible for the denials and resulting dismissals of his appeals actions as they would not act on his motions and merely deny them outright or by not making a ruling until it's jurisdiction has run and any order is “timed out” . He has had this Appeals court do this twice when it was known to the court the information sought to be found or augmented to the record was fatal to the opposition, they denied them outright or by not making a ruling until it's jurisdiction has run.

al-Hakim had requested the Appeals Court grant his request to supplement the record on Appeal and present evidence imperative to the establishment of Ron Cook, the law firm of Willoughby Stuart and Bening, CSAA and it's defense counsels Sean O'Halloran, Stephan Barber and the firm of Ropers Majeski as the hostile intervener in his underlying case against Rescue Industries and Bay Area Carpets, provided evidence that was procured thru admitted suborned and solicited perjurious testimony by them and the underlying defendants, their counsels and experts; engaged in actions to interfere with his legal case; engaged in actions to coverup the unlawful act of suborn and solicited perjurious testimony; committed fraud upon the court of the State of California; committed willful, criminal and corrupt perjury, fraud, conspiracy to commit fraud; fraudulent concealment by willfully and intentionally withholding their knowledge and insight of the intervention hearing and the transcript of said hearing; and allowed the trial to proceed knowing their responsibility and the legal impact; extrinsic fraud; spoliation of evidence; and qualify for the doctrine of unclean hands with the appropriate consequent sanctions and punishment upon them was denied with no explanation.

As these actions were taken against the State, the State has a vested interested in this matter not going forward in a fair and just manner , and is the basis for not providing al-Hakim with the clerks transcripts that were ordered and paid for; the ordered and paid for transcripts of the hearings to complete the record on appeal; denying the motions to Augment the Record on Appeal and for an Extension of Time to file the Opening Brief; and not ruling on the July 31, 2008 Motion for Reconsideration of the courts July 19, 2008 order denying al-Hakim requests to Augment the Record on Appeal and for an Extension of Time to file the Opening Brief; and finally- dismissing the case. This fact is apparent and resonates with inherent bias when Judge Alexander tells District Attorney Vangeria Harvey “It seems like what got us (the State) into this problem is: The wrong person got the money in the first place, at some point in time”.

Corruption and Collusion
These activities were done in concert with Oakland City Attorneys John Russo, Mark Morodomi, Randy Hall, Janie Wong, Anita Hong, Sophia Li, Demetruis Shelton, Elizabeth Allen, Erica Harrold, Michele Abney, Eliada Perez, and former Oakland and current San Leandro City Attorney Jayne Williams and former employee Pat Smith; Stephan Barber and others of the law firm Ropers, Majeski; Ronald J. Cook, Randy Willoughby, Alex Stuart, Bradley Bening and others of the law firm Willoughby, Stuart & Bening; William Jemmott now of the law firm Wilson Elser; Todd Jones and the law firm Archer Norris; Daniel Crowley of the law firm Daniel Crowley & Assoc.; Fletcher Alford, Joel K. Liberson and the law firm Gordon & Rees; Sean Robert O'Halloran now of the law firm Crone Rozynko; Anne Brooks Harrigan now of the law firm Grancell, Lebovitz, Stander, Barnes & Reubens; Yolanda Marnell Jackson now of the law firm Jackson Alternative Dispute Resolution; the law firm of Caven, Cleaveland, Murray; the former law firm of Jackson Harrigan; John Ratto and Dean K. Beyer, of ASU Group (formerly DL Glaze); defendants Rescue Rooter and Bay Area Carpet Cleaning; and retired Judges David Lee, Michael Ballachey, and Richard Hodge. Retired Judges Lee, Michael Ballachey, and Richard Hodge, though they live in three different counties, all coincidentally hired the same Oakland defense firm run by former Oakland and current San Leandro City Attorney Jayne Williams whom was responsible for providing the files to the defendants initially that was then given to her client Judge Lee for trial. There has been judiciary litigation support given by now Appellate Judges Barbara Jones, James Richman, and Henry Needham and Superior Court Judge Frank Roesch whom had disqualifications or complaints filed against them with cover and sanctuary provide by Ronald M. George of The California Supreme Court, Victoria Henley of The California Judicial Council, Ronald G. Overholt of The California Judges Association, The Alameda County Presiding Court Judge Yolanda Northridge and former Alameda County Presiding Court Judge George Hernandez that portrays corruption.

This onerous, odious taint and obvious complicity in quilt of these crimes makes it legally impossible for Brown to unbiasedly and practically investigate and prosecute the wrong doing of ALL the parties known to have committed these heinous, over 13 years of crimes against al-Hakim, his family, business, clients, community, and humanity as he himself defended the criminals and covered up the very same corruption he is supposed to be investigating and prosecuting!

Investigation Must Go Forward
Theses are some of the myriad of reasons this matter is being referred back to Congressman John Conyers and the Judiciary Committee and to you, the United States Attorney General and the Department of Justice for complete investigation into the actions of the various Judges, court administration, State Attorney General, Alameda County District Attorney, Oakland City Attorney, various attorneys, defendants and their employees, agents, contractors, experts, and witnesses and the prosecution of the crimes against al-Hakim.

This ultimate form of persecution through punishment by corruption is unacceptable in a civilized society and undermines human dignity. (UN General Assembly, Moratorium on the Use of the Death Penalty, Resolution 62/149, Dec. 18, 2007; reaffirmed, Resolution 63/168, Dec. 18, 2008.) The interests of justice would best be served by the granting of a new trial to Abdul-Jalil al-Hakim and his family. The trial should fully comply with international standards of justice and should not allow for the reimposition of judicial, governmental and attorney corruption, fruad, misconduct, Islamophobia and Xenophobia.

It is noted with great interest that you both have stood for Government Transparency, Accountability, Civic Reform in cleaning up Government and Law Enforcement aimed at restoring public confidence in government, maintaining the Highest Ethical Standards, “Whistleblower's” Program, Legal Services aimed at improving conditions for the poor, initiated law suits against individuals and corporations allegedly causing harm to the public and environment, elder abuse, homeowner and tenant rights, the foreclosure and banking crisis, and violent crime as has Attorney General and candidate for Governor Jerry Brown, Oakland City Attorney John Russo, former Oakland and current San Leandro City Attorney Jayne Williams, former District Attorney Tom Orloff, and current District Attorney Nancy E. O'Malley.

It is noted with great interest the actions you have taken with regard to Senator Ted Stevens' conviction to assure that he not be denied his constitutional rights. You were specifically outraged by the fact that the prosecution withheld information critical to the defense's argument for acquittal, a violation clearly committed by the courts and defense in al-Hakim's case. Though not a US senator of great wealth and power, al-Hakim is a Black man revered around the world for his intelligence, courage, clarity, and commitment and deserves no less than Senator Stevens.

This case should be of real concern to everyone interested in justice. Sadly, al-Hakim's case was concluded in his absence amid the very racial cowardice of which you, yourself, have spoken.

This case should be of real concern to everyone interested in justice. Sadly, al-Hakim's case was concluded in his absence while he was at a previously approved court noticed leave for a funeral for the second death of an over 40 year friend that occurred during this trial amid the very racial cowardice of which you, yourself, have spoken.

Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. is known for, among other things, having said that "injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere" . Ignoring any instance of racism inside the courtroom leads to injustice that threatens us all.

There is no statute of limitations on the US Constitution and I therefore request that you do all within your power to review the totality of the circumstances as they are now known in 2010 in both cases of Abdul-Jalil al-Hakim and ensure that his Constitutional rights (in the form of racially-tinged and religiously motivated corruption, prosecutorial and judicial misconduct) were and are not abridged. The imperative for a civil rights investigation is clear and I specifically request that of your office.

Abdul-Jalil al-Hakim is prepared to meet with you or anyone you designate for the purpose of engaging in a dialogue on this matter and look forward to hearing from you soon.

Please accept this request within all applicable rules and regulations.

As the undersigned, I state for myself that I have willingly endorsed this petition with my signature that will be appended here based on the contact information I entered into this online form.

Cordially,

(Your signature will be appended here based on the contact information you enter in the online form and once you click on 'Sign Petition' it goes through immediately)