Petíciu ctihodného prezidenta Baracka Obamu "



Petíciu ctihodného prezidenta Baracka Obamu "

Podpísať petíciu TERAZ postaviť proti korupcii, vládne, právne a policajné pochybenia; White Collar Crime, Nekalé obchodné praktiky a zamestnanosť, podvod na zákazníkoch, a ukázať vašu podporu pre transparentnosť vlády, zodpovednosť; Občianske reforiem; Posilňovanie etických štandardov, občianske práva a náboženská Sloboda!

Petíciu Honorables prezident Barack Hussein Obama II a Spojené štáty generálny prokurátor Eric Holder, Jr Himpton

Zadaním Vaše meno tu sú pripevnenie svoj podpis k tejto petícii (povinné):

Kto by ste chceli poslať petíciu k? Prosím, vyberte jednu.
Čestná prezident Barack Hussein Obama II alebo generálny prokurátor Eric Čestná Himpton Holder, Jr? (Povinné)

Od: Vaše meno (povinné)

Mesto je žiť (povinné)

Stavu si Live In (vyžadované)

Vaše PSČ (povinné)

Váš e-mail (vyžadované)

Dnešný dátum (vyžadované)

Chcem, aby predložila túto petíciu.

Pre: ctihodný prezident Barack Hussein Obama II
Biely dom
1600 Pennsylvania Avenue
Washington, DC 20500

Ctihodný pán Eric Holder Himpton, Jr
Spojené štáty generálny prokurátor
Spojené štáty ministerstvo spravodlivosti
Washington, DC 20500

cc: OSN Secy Gen Pan Ki-mun, vysoký komisár pre ľudské práva pani Navanethem Pillay, prezident Spojených národov pre ľudské práva Rady pána Martina Ihoeghian Uhomoibhi, Spojených štátov, Senátu a Snemovne justičnej výborov a kongresová Black klub

Honorables prezident Barack Hussein Obama II a generálny prokurátor Eric Holder Himpton, Jr:

Ja, dolupodpísaný Podľa duchu ústavy Spojených štátov a slobodnej demokracie, na registrovaných a kvalifikovaní občania a voliči v Spojených štátoch amerických, píšem vám s pocitom veľkej znepokojenie a rozhorčenie petičné vás a požiadať o vaše osobné a okamžitý zásah ukončiť na odporné nespravodlivosti v prípadoch Abdul Jalil al-Hakim v CSAA, Alameda County Prípad č 811337-3 a Abdul-Jalil al-Hakim hmota RESCUE Industries, Inc, vec č . 821885-2.

Každý, koho počul o tomto prípade si prečítajte prípadové súbory, spravodajstvo, prezerať videá alebo informácie obsiahnuté a podané v prípadoch, vrátane nohavičiek a stanoviská súdov, vie, že obaja štúdií Abdul Jalil Al-Hakim je súdení a rozhodované uprostred korupcie, senzáciechtivosti a hystéria, že vo svojom jadre predstavuje rasovej šialenstvo a náboženského prenasledovania. Indicting slová od sudcov, zatiaľ čo na lavičke v oboch prípadoch sami, prejdite k rasizmu, predsudkov a predsudkov ešte v súdnej sieni.

Vyzývam vás k náprave tejto 13 ročnej histórii hrubé porušenie ústavného práva Spojených štátov a medzinárodných štandardov spravodlivosti, ako to dokazuje mnohých právnych skupín po celom svete a pre ministerstvo spravodlivosti, aby okamžite začať vyšetrovanie občianske práva skúmať mnoho príkladov z odporné a rasistických súdov, prokuratúr, advokát, a firemné pochybenia sa datuje k pôvodnému súdu záchranného Industries v roku 2003 a pokračujúce v priebehu procesu CSAA končí v roku 2008 na súčasnú nečinnosť štátu Kalifornia odvolací súd a vrchný súdy. Premlčacia lehota by nemala byť faktorom v tomto prípade existuje veľmi silný dôkaz o pokračujúcej sprisahanie za účelom popierať Abdul-Jalil svoje ústavné práva.

Al-Hakim v CSAA a záchranné Industries prípadoch sú oba cez $ 20 miliónov 13 rokov; sporné právne opatrenia, ktoré má najväčšie spis v histórii Alameda County vrchný súd, s viac ako 70 súborov krabíc spisov, v priebehu 120 pohyby a odpovede, al-Hakim mal cez 300 chodník exponáty, viac ako 5000 strán exponátov, 3000 strán dokumentov o tvrdenie skúšobnej vyvracajúce, 20 odborných svedkov, ďalších 77 svedkov, cez 100 strán poroty inštrukcií; diskvalifikáciou je podaná proti každého sudcu pre rad obvinení z justičnej pochybenia na korupciu, kde každý sudca v tomto prípade sa priznal chybu, spáchal krivej prísahy, recused sami, alebo všetky tri!

Abdul-Jalil al-Hakim, veľmi dobre známy, úspešný obchodný manažér, producent a moslim natívne afroamerického pôvodu z Oaklande, Kalifornia, podala sťažnosť na Federálna Spojené štáty generálny prokurátor a ministerstvo spravodlivosti, trestného činu z nenávisti z islamofóbie a xenofóbie voči nemu dopustil sudca David C. Lee počas procesu záchranného Industries vo vrchnej súd Alameda County, Kalifornia.

Toto úsilie je aj naďalej pohybuje toto šetrenie predložiť obvinenie z trestného vonkajšie podvodu na Súdny štátu Kalifornia, olúpili dôkazov, a princíp "nečisté ruky" proti obžalovaným / nepriateľskej vedľajšej AAA poistenie; Ron Cook a Advokátska kancelária Willoughby, Stuart & Bening, obhajca Steve Barber a Advokátska kancelária Ropers Majeski a Oakland City prokurátor John Russo, Mark Morodomi, Randy Hall, Janie Wong, Anita Hong, Sophia Li, Demetruis Shelton, Elizabeth Allen, Erica Harrold, Michele Abneyová, Eliade Perez, bývalý a súčasný Oakland San Leandro Mesto advokát Jayne Williams a bývalý zamestnanec Oakland City Pat Smith za predpokladu, že spis k žalovanej Stephan Barber a Ron Cook takmer rok a nepodarilo sa im oznámiť súdu tento neodpustiteľný nezákonné porušenie v reťazca starostlivosti o súbore, úmyselného a úmyselné výroby a vývojového falošné doklady.

Federálne Sťažnosť, ktorú vypracovala a podala v Abdul-Jalil v pre za, má širokú báze podporu demokratov i republikánov, bol predložený kongresmanka Barbara Lee s kanceláriou kongresmanov John Conyers a Charles Rangel, bol preskúmanie niekoľkých právnych expertov, s obhajobou bývalým republikánskym senátorom JC Watts, klient al-Hakim je.

Federálne Sťažnosť rieši obavy, že rokovania Superior sudcov sa zvýšil na úroveň protiplnenie za federálnej zločin a občianskych práv porušenie, pretože lavice, na ktoré sa sudca pravidiel je "pod farbu zákona" a iste porušenie kohokoľvek občianske práva je federálny zločin. "Moslimovia, rovnako ako iné skupiny, nemôže sa báť hovoriť, keď ich práva boli skrátená. Pokiaľ človek nemá hovoriť, potom priestupky ide neohláseného a páchateľ pokračuje poškodiť opäť bez povšimnutia, nezáleží na tom, komu je hriešnik "povedal al-Hakim.

Sťažnosť, možno ešte dôležitejšie, a to nielen požadované Merenda Friedlander, vedúci oddelenia občianskych práv, aby sa vyšetrovanie súdneho motivovaných trestných činov, ale aj mnoho ďalších občianskych práv a riadneho procesu porušovaniu súdnictva a štátnej pochybenia, a právnik vonkajšie podvod na súd a právo, ktoré sú samy o sebe priamo záležitosti sťažovali. JC Watts v duchu hovoríte: "Čo má teroristický čin v Rusku majú čo do činenia s nedbanlivosti kontaminácii domov v Amerike?" Predstavuje tvrdenie, že tam musí byť zvážení a odpoveď na mnoho otázok v sťažnosti.

Po preskúmaní v Usage úradu, bol prípad myšlienka ako bytia tak mimoriadny, že aj neslávny Bradley Schlozman, ktoré je teraz vystrelil a čelia federálnej obvinenia odstúpil s generálnym prokurátorom Alberto Gonzalez pre odstránenie demokratických advokátov z kancelárie amerických generálov zástupcov sa na celoštátnej úrovni, ktorá bola odoslaná al-Hakim list predložiť záležitosť (z dôvodu príslušnosti obmedzenia) do Kalifornie generálny prokurátor štátu Kalifornia štátnej advokátskej komory, Kalifornia štátnej súdnej rady a Kalifornia štátnej poisťovacie vládnej komisie pre vyšetrovanie a stíhanie. a títo boli republikánski Sudcovia a advokátskej je sa sťažoval!

Ale to nemohlo stať. Kalifornia generálny prokurátor a kandidát na guvernéra, Jerry Brown, ktorý je zodpovedný za vykonávanie vyšetrovaní Oakland City prokurátor John Russo, bývalý Oakland a San Leandro aktuálne mestský advokát Jayne Williams, bývalý okresný prokurátor Tom Orloff, aktuálne okresný prokurátor Nancy E. O'Malley , Alameda County vrchný súd, štátny Odvolanie a sudcovia Najvyššieho súdu, a rôzne firemné obžalovaní v tomto prípade je sám obhajovať niektoré z tých zločincov, a zakrývanie samý korupcii sa očakáva, že bude vyšetrovanie a trestné stíhanie!

Kalifornia generálny prokurátor Jerry Brown, Oakland City prokurátor John Russo, bývalý a súčasný Oakland San Leandro Mesto prokurátor Jayne Williams, bývalý okresný advokát Tom Orloff a súčasná okresný prokurátor Nancy E. O'Malley, tvrdia, že sú zástancovia transparentnosť vlády, zodpovednosť Občianske a reforma a vychvaľujú svoje sľuby a úspechy na televíznych a rozhlasových relácií, na videách, na svojich internetových stránkach, v mnohých tlačových správach a vo výsledných spravodajských článkov. Ak chcete mať na tieto vznešené sľuby, že všetci sprievode Civic reformu čistenie Vláda a presadzovanie zákona zameraný na obnovenie dôvery verejnosti vo vláde, pri zachovaní najvyšších etických štandardov, "informátorov je" program, právne služby zamerané na zlepšenie podmienok pre chudobných, začatých žalôb proti fyzických a právnických osôb údajne poškodzuje verejnosti a životného prostredia, starší zneužívania, domu a nájomník práva, obmedzenie prístupu a bankovej krízy, a násilnej trestnej činnosti.

Ich móda sa ako nezávislí strážne psi a vrátnici pre ľudí, boj proti vládnej a policajné pochybenia a korupcie, zločinu, nepotismu nekalých pracovné postupy a násilné gangy podvod na zákazníkoch, nekalých obchodných praktík, Kalifornia je nefunkčný systém zdravotnej starostlivosti, kampane zverejnenia a lobistov aktivity.

Podľa webu Russo, je v reálnom Oakland administratívna reforma (ROAR) navrhnuté tak, aby "si vedenie mesta zodpovednejšia, transparentnejšia a efektívnejšia."

Avšak bližšie vyšetrenie odhalí, že tieto nie sú ničím iným ako prázdnymi slovami, aby závoj svojej neúspešnej sľuby; makléra pre White Collar Crime, podporuje rasizmu a fanatizmu, selektívne stíhanie a bielej triedy výsadou!

Generálny prokurátor Jerry Brown, Oakland City prokurátor John Russo, bývalý a súčasný Oakland San Leandro Mesto prokurátor Jayne Williams, bývalý okresný advokát Tom Orloff a okresných prokurátora Nancy E. O'Malley je firemné súdy samy o sebe robí niečo viac ako v rovnakom "shakedown "nesúhlasí, ak sú sued.When oni sa vyrovnajú tieto náročnejšie obleky, ktoré umožňujú firemné páchateľa z obliga pre naozaj nespočetné milióny dolárov v poplatkov, pokút, penále, reštitúcie, sankcie, náklady, skutočné a následné škody a výnosy nikdy ísť na obete týchto podnikových podvodníkov, verejný! Ďalej sú tieto firemné podvodníci nikdy poslaný do väzenia za svoje zločiny bieleho goliera, ale väčšina menšiny, prisťahovalci, alebo náboženských menšín porušujú poslaný do väzenia s maximálnou tresty za údajné porušenie menších. Kde je rovná výkonu, spravodlivosti a dokonca i rúk stíhanie údajných trestných činov? Prečo Brown, Russo, Williams, Orloff a O'Malley Foster viditeľné selektívne trestné stíhanie a súdne spory delí rasy, peniaze, trieda, pohlavie, krajinu pôvodu, náboženstvo? verejnosť znásilnenia týmito eskamotérské-of-hand trestného sporu taktike podnikových podvodníkov, hnedé, Russo, Williams, Orloff a O'Malley zatiaľ čo je omyl do podozrenia, že sú "ochrancami dôveru verejnosti! "ako Russo štátov", že je úlohou vlády, aby viedla národy podnikať menom ľudí, zodpovedných osôb, a pred zrakmi ľudí. "

Oakland City prokurátor John Russo a bývalý Oakland a aktuálne San Leandro Mesto prokurátor Jayne Williams vyrobené dôkazy a zasadil, že dôkazy priaznivého žalovaných v prípade súborov.

al-Hakim má tiež nedávno produkoval jasný, nevyvrátiteľný, založil "dymiace zbraň" dokladom o trvalom krikľavých ilegálnych aktivitách mesta Oakland prokurátor John Russo, bývalý Oakland a San Leandro aktuálne mestský advokát Jayne Williams, bývalý zamestnanec Oakland City Pat Smith, obhajca Stephan Kaderníctvo a obžalovaný Ron Cook v CSAA a základné záchranné Rooter prípad, že Oakland City prokurátor John Russo a mesto advokátska kancelária sa zaviazala vonkajšie PODVODOM, podvod na štáte a podriadenosť A pokus o krivoprisahajúci svedectvo, POSKYTOVANIE SÚBOROV sporov CASE a dôkazy TO DEFENDANTS, SPOLIATION OF EVIDENCE, FABRICATING EVIDENCE AND PLANTING FABRICATED EVIDENCE IN LITIGATION CASE FILES , ATTEMPTING TO DECEIVE THE PUBLIC IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANTS LITIGATION THEORY, CALUMNY DECEIT by giving the case files to defendant Stephan Barber and others of the law firm Ropers, Majeski , and Ronald J. Cook, Randy Willoughby, Alex Stuart, Bradley Bening and others of the law firm Willoughby, Stuart & Bening for nearly a year; then clearly constructed fraudulent fabricated evidence in 1999 and planted that evidence favorable to the defendants in the files SIX years AFTER the case was closed; engaged in spoliation of remaining evidence in the court files from 1991; and fostered witness testimony based on this planted evidence in the al-Hakim v CSAA and the underlying Rescue Rooter case that was created thru EXTRINSIC FRAUD with accompanying testimony procured thru admitted suborned and solicited perjurious acts by John Russo and others, they engaged in actions to destroy the litigation of al-Hakim's legal case; they engaged in actions to coverup their unlawful acts; they committed, aided and abetted this criminal activity with this unpardonable breach in the chain of custody of the court files to accommodate the defendants litigation strategy in both the CSAA and the underlying Rescue Rooter case.

John Russo, Mark Morodomi, Randy Hall, Janie Wong, Anita Hong, Sophia Li, Demetruis Shelton, Elizabeth Allen, Erica Harrold, Michele Abney, Eliada Perez, and former Oakland and current San Leandro City Attorney Jayne Williams and former Oakland City employee Pat Smith, defendants Stephan Barber and Ron Cook have all failed and refused to provide the information sought by al-Hakim, and further failed and refused to appear under court ordered subpoena for deposition testimony twice and under court ordered subpoena for trial testimony and have caused al-Hakim and family to be forced from their $1 million plus home and office, foreclosed from an over $20 million law suit, and multi million business for 13 years thru the City Attorneys' violation of the business and professional codes, extrinsic fraud, subornation of perjurious testimony, committing these acts under the color of law with unclean hands, and should be prosecuted to the full extent of the law.

John Russo, former Oakland and current San Leandro City Attorney Jayne Williams and the Oakland City Attorney office staffs' criminal violations of the Civil Code, Business and Professions Code, the Rules of Professional Conduct, and the California Cannons strikes at the heart of al-Hakim's fundamental civil and human rights, and the right to due process under the law guaranteed by the United States Constitution Amendments and the California Constitution. These actions qualify as a Hate Crime under the Unruh Rights Act, the Ralph Civil Rights Act and the Bane Act, while they are clear crimes of religious bigotry and intolerance, as such, this conduct rose to the level of consideration for a Federal Crime and a Civil Rights violation because the City Attorney's Office operates “under the color of law” and certainly the violation of anyone's civil rights is a federal crime. This deprivation of al-Hakim's civil, human and due process rights by the law enforcement body of the City Attorneys' office of Oakland rise to the level of criminal activity and “misconduct by local and federal law enforcement officials. These criminal actions by Russo and his staff demand they be issued court ordered subpoena to testify.

Action against former Alameda County District Attorney Tom Orloff, current District Attorney Nancy E. O'Malley, and the Alameda County Department of Child Support Services (ACDCSS)

al-Hakim had to file an action against former District Attorney Tom Orloff and the Alameda County District Attorney's (DA) and the Alameda County Department of Child Support Services (ACDCSS) because for over 15 years they repeatedly failed and refused to enforce the courts own orders for the fair and proper application and accounting of payments al-Hakim made in trust to the DA in their fiduciary capacity for the minor al-Hakim child depriving al-Hakim and the minor child of over $2,000 of monies paid. In doing so, the DA creating a “mythical” arrearage and open account in al-Hakim's name and on his behalf owed to the minor child, and when al-Hakim refused to pay their fraud as he does to this day, then illegally charged al-Hakim with the crime of violating the child support statute for nonpayment, reporting the alleged violation to the State of California for Collection and the State Department of Motor Vehicles for suspension of his driving privilege for nonpayment and illegally tossing al-Hakim into “debtors prison” , suspending his drivers license, revoking his passport, and ruining his multi-million credit. ACDCSS actions and claimed “right” to perform in this manner are not contained in any State or Federal statute, regulation, or other legislative act and therefore, do not have the force of law and renders it constitutionally infirm and no court officer can merely “grant” a ruling in their favor to cover getting caught having done so.

State of California Attorney General Jerry Brown and Candidate for Governor Substitutes In
On January 22, 2008 California Attorney General Jerry Brown and the Office of The Attorney General of The State of California substituted in as attorney of record in this case for the Alameda County Department of Child Support Services allegedly “In The Interest of Justice” . What justice is there when he then defended, concealed and thereby further complicitly committed the admitted willful and intentional extrinsic fraud upon the State, al-Hakim and his family, and the court; prosecutorial misconduct; willful and malicious prosecution; misconduct; conflict of interest; obstruction of justice; denial of due process under the law; willful and intentional fabrication and authoring false evidence; misstating and mischaracterizing evidence; misrepresentation and concealment of material facts with knowledge of the truth with the intent to induce the court's act or reliance; harassment; and intimidation committed by former District Attorney Tom Orloff, current DA's Nancy E. O'Malley, Maureen Lenahan, Valgeria Harvey, counselors L. Lavagetto, Ms. K. Pendergrass, Ms. Adler, Kris Ferre, and accountant Mr. Lovelady and others unnamed in the DA's office; as well as Commissioner Glenn Oleon's abuse of discretion, willful misconduct, conduct prejudicial, illegal ex-parte communications and bias that resulted in error.

Pri odvolanie bolo al-Hakim nútení podať návrh proti Jerry Brown rozšíriť súdny záznam obsahujú významné prepisy vypočúvaní, že DA pripustili, že oni podvádzali al-Hakim rodinu. Despite the fact that al-Hakim had paid for the transcripts in advance, as with the motions that were “denied” because the appeals court did not rule on them in a timely manner, it also refused to augment the record on appeal when it was clear that the evidence would be harmful to the State and defendants Alameda County Department of Child Support Services (ACDCSS) and the Alameda County District Attorney(DA). The Appeals Court had discretion to take additional evidence on appeal (Code Civ. Proc., § 909.) where the proffered evidence demonstrates that the matter turns on the evidence tendered.

Alameda County Superior Court Judge Jon Tigar
Alameda County Judge Jon Tigar, visibly shaking and muttering, suffered a mental meltdown on the bench as he admitted in open court striking the Seventh Challenge For Cause, a scathing over 750 page indictment, without reading it moments after it was filed and served on him by al-Hakim in the court room on November 20, 2008!!!

After about 5 minutes of being unable to come up with anything, Tigar starts to meltdown babbling and muttering that “al-Hakim said that all the allegations in this challenge are the same as the previous ones, that he doesn't want to go through another challenge, he wants to make the ruling on the motions, and “although the appeals court may not agree, that he was striking the challenge without reading it”, al-Hakim can file a writ if he wants and if the appeals court agrees, then al-Hakim will get another hearing” . He then states that the order will be available after the hearing.

He then avoided, failed and refused to timely file and serve a written answer to the Challenge For Cause and proceeded to rule on the matters heard that moment and denied both al-Hakim's Motions to Vacate the Bereavement Order of April 7, 2008 and Trial Ending Minute Order of April 9, 2008 of unscrupulous Judge Tigar.

Judge Jon Tigar aborted critical witness testimony of The Honorable Judge Leo Dorado because he and Defense Counsel/ Defendants Stephan Barber and others of the law firm Ropers, Majeski, as well as Ronald J. Cook, Randy Willoughby, Alex Stuart, Bradley Bening and others of the law firm Willoughby, Stuart & Bening, feared al-Hakim would explore corruption, collusion, and misconduct of the Judges and lawyers reported to US Attorney General in the al-Hakim Cases!

Further, Tigar aborted the testimony of Co-Defense Counsel/Defendant Ron Cook yet al-Hakim still manage to get over 20 critical admissions of undeniable guilt of Stephan Barber and others of the law firm Ropers, Majeski, and Cook, Randy Willoughby, Alex Stuart, Bradley Bening. Tigar also libeled testimony and authored perjurious, deceptive, and fraudulent bereavement and trial ending orders to destroy the litigation of al-Hakim's legal case!

Judge Tigar's actions of "deliberate judicial dishonesty" are not only willfully and intentionally illegal, harmful, dangerous, libelous, perjurious, deceptive and fraudulent in violation of al-Hakim's civil and human rights and right to due process: they are insolent, offensive, insulting, and impugn the integrity of the court and he did this IN SUPPORT of the DEFENDANTS LITIGATION THEORY whom served as his own legal counsel in this very same case!

There is an infinite amount of evidence herein to attest to Tigar's lying under oath and perjury, misrepresentations, deceit, dishonesty, willful and prejudicial misconduct, bad faith, incompetence, conflicts of interest, bias, calling al-Hakim a liar without any substantiation or justification; instructing al-Hakim not to mention Tigar's perjury or to speak his own truth; threatened retaliation to charge him with contempt when al-Hakim refused to back off his charges of the judges perjury, deceit; entitling orders for his convenience to deny them and avoid appellate review; entitling orders for his convenience to deny them and issues sanctions; willfully and intentionally withholding filing and serving orders (possibly backdating orders) then acted on the orders after the applicable deadlines for al-Hakim to legally and properly respond, thus forcing al-Hakim to forfeit his civil rights and right to due process; irresponsible failure as a judge to read, interpret, and apply the applicable laws, accusing al-Hakim of attacking judges in open court, has attacked other parties in open court while dressed in civilian clothes yet performing his duties as a judge and his honest refusal to recuse “goes beyond mere negligence” ; this conduct falls into the category of willful misconduct by a judge as arising out of conduct which is done in bad faith and conduct prejudicial to the administration of justice that brings the judicial office into disrepute. The deception practiced by Judge Tigar during these events, as well as his specious actions before al-Hakim on every occasion, are equally antithetical to, and inherently incompatible with, his duties to uphold the law and the search for truth, reflects a gross lack of judicial temperament and a purpose other than the faithful discharge of judicial duty, and is at minimum improper action.

al-Hakim presents clear, uncontroverted, unopposed, uncontested, corroborated proof Tigar has written, signed and submitted willfully perjurious, deceptive and fraudulent orders in attempting to deceive the public in support of his rulings; threatened, and belittled al-Hakim; made improper references of al-Hakim's character and as being untruthful; coupled with his perjury regarding the discovery matters and categorical denial of every discovery issue raised before him by al-Hakim reflected a prejudgment of al-Hakim's discovery claims, his case and a lack of impartiality; responded to his disqualification by his failure and refusal to timely filing an answer; doing so 8 days later only after al-Hakim had requested the written answer at least six times; filing an answer 8 days later only after al-Hakim contested his continued sitting in the case and indicated his intent to file an appeal for same; stating al-Hakim “attacks judges” in his answer without any explanation; calling al-Hakim a liar in his answer without any substance; publicly criticizing al-Hakim in court on the record; repeatedly lied under oath; made knowingly false statements in an effort to demean, humiliate and provoke plaintiff while lying under oath and perjury; dishonesty; fraudulent deception; calumny deceit; willful and prejudicial misconduct; abuse of discretion; negligence; bias; prejudice; misrepresentation; incompetence; conflict of interest; bad faith; collusion; denial of due process; obstruction of justice; racism; bigotry; has exhibited, expressed and shown a fixed opinion of al-Hakim; displayed favoritism towards the defendants; made false accusations; harassed al-Hakim; has willfully, deceitfully and recklessly indulged in a series of offensive acts and statements against plaintiff and has displayed disdain, malice, and a mental attitude or disposition toward al-Hakim that prohibits the right to a fair hearing or trial; failed and refused to respond to the allegations contained in the challenges for cause; conduct prejudicial; and advocated a judicial imprimatur of the defense's position were grounds for disqualification under Code Civ. Proc. on the ground of misconduct, prejudicial misconduct, bias, and prejudice in violations of Code Civ. Proc., Business and Professions Codes, the Rules of Professional Conduct, the California Const., the California Code of Judicial Ethics Canons that violates al-Hakim's fundamental civil rights and due process under the law guaranteed by the United States Constitution and as applicable to the State of California Constitution as a "miscarriage of justice." Judge Tigar's persistent willful misconduct, bad faith, mistreatment, promised retaliation and “atmosphere of unfairness” determines that there is a high probability he will continue his unethical behavior if he were to continue in a judicial capacity in the future.

California Appeals Court
al-Hakim has feared, and quite correctly so, that as in the past, this California Appeals Court Division lead by Appellate Judges Barbara Jones, James Richman, and Henry Needham with cover and sanctuary provide by Ronald M. George of The California Supreme Court, and court administrators Mary Quilez and Clerk Diana Herbert had engaged in and were directly responsible for the denials and resulting dismissals of his appeals actions as they would not act on his motions and merely deny them outright or by not making a ruling until it's jurisdiction has run and any order is “timed out” . He has had this Appeals court do this twice when it was known to the court the information sought to be found or augmented to the record was fatal to the opposition, they denied them outright or by not making a ruling until it's jurisdiction has run.

al-Hakim had requested the Appeals Court grant his request to supplement the record on Appeal and present evidence imperative to the establishment of Ron Cook, the law firm of Willoughby Stuart and Bening, CSAA and it's defense counsels Sean O'Halloran, Stephan Barber and the firm of Ropers Majeski as the hostile intervener in his underlying case against Rescue Industries and Bay Area Carpets, provided evidence that was procured thru admitted suborned and solicited perjurious testimony by them and the underlying defendants, their counsels and experts; engaged in actions to interfere with his legal case; engaged in actions to coverup the unlawful act of suborn and solicited perjurious testimony; committed fraud upon the court of the State of California; committed willful, criminal and corrupt perjury, fraud, conspiracy to commit fraud; fraudulent concealment by willfully and intentionally withholding their knowledge and insight of the intervention hearing and the transcript of said hearing; and allowed the trial to proceed knowing their responsibility and the legal impact; extrinsic fraud; spoliation of evidence; and qualify for the doctrine of unclean hands with the appropriate consequent sanctions and punishment upon them was denied with no explanation.

As these actions were taken against the State, the State has a vested interested in this matter not going forward in a fair and just manner , and is the basis for not providing al-Hakim with the clerks transcripts that were ordered and paid for; the ordered and paid for transcripts of the hearings to complete the record on appeal; denying the motions to Augment the Record on Appeal and for an Extension of Time to file the Opening Brief; and not ruling on the July 31, 2008 Motion for Reconsideration of the courts July 19, 2008 order denying al-Hakim requests to Augment the Record on Appeal and for an Extension of Time to file the Opening Brief; and finally- dismissing the case. This fact is apparent and resonates with inherent bias when Judge Alexander tells District Attorney Vangeria Harvey “It seems like what got us (the State) into this problem is: The wrong person got the money in the first place, at some point in time”.

Corruption and Collusion
These activities were done in concert with Oakland City Attorneys John Russo, Mark Morodomi, Randy Hall, Janie Wong, Anita Hong, Sophia Li, Demetruis Shelton, Elizabeth Allen, Erica Harrold, Michele Abney, Eliada Perez, and former Oakland and current San Leandro City Attorney Jayne Williams and former employee Pat Smith; Stephan Barber and others of the law firm Ropers, Majeski; Ronald J. Cook, Randy Willoughby, Alex Stuart, Bradley Bening and others of the law firm Willoughby, Stuart & Bening; William Jemmott now of the law firm Wilson Elser; Todd Jones and the law firm Archer Norris; Daniel Crowley of the law firm Daniel Crowley & Assoc.; Fletcher Alford, Joel K. Liberson and the law firm Gordon & Rees; Sean Robert O'Halloran now of the law firm Crone Rozynko; Anne Brooks Harrigan now of the law firm Grancell, Lebovitz, Stander, Barnes & Reubens; Yolanda Marnell Jackson now of the law firm Jackson Alternative Dispute Resolution; the law firm of Caven, Cleaveland, Murray; the former law firm of Jackson Harrigan; John Ratto and Dean K. Beyer, of ASU Group (formerly DL Glaze); defendants Rescue Rooter and Bay Area Carpet Cleaning; and retired Judges David Lee, Michael Ballachey, and Richard Hodge. Retired Judges Lee, Michael Ballachey, and Richard Hodge, though they live in three different counties, all coincidentally hired the same Oakland defense firm run by former Oakland and current San Leandro City Attorney Jayne Williams whom was responsible for providing the files to the defendants initially that was then given to her client Judge Lee for trial. There has been judiciary litigation support given by now Appellate Judges Barbara Jones, James Richman, and Henry Needham and Superior Court Judge Frank Roesch whom had disqualifications or complaints filed against them with cover and sanctuary provide by Ronald M. George of The California Supreme Court, Victoria Henley of The California Judicial Council, Ronald G. Overholt of The California Judges Association, The Alameda County Presiding Court Judge Yolanda Northridge and former Alameda County Presiding Court Judge George Hernandez that portrays corruption.

This onerous, odious taint and obvious complicity in quilt of these crimes makes it legally impossible for Brown to unbiasedly and practically investigate and prosecute the wrong doing of ALL the parties known to have committed these heinous, over 13 years of crimes against al-Hakim, his family, business, clients, community, and humanity as he himself defended the criminals and covered up the very same corruption he is supposed to be investigating and prosecuting!

Investigation Must Go Forward
Theses are some of the myriad of reasons this matter is being referred back to Congressman John Conyers and the Judiciary Committee and to you, the United States Attorney General and the Department of Justice for complete investigation into the actions of the various Judges, court administration, State Attorney General, Alameda County District Attorney, Oakland City Attorney, various attorneys, defendants and their employees, agents, contractors, experts, and witnesses and the prosecution of the crimes against al-Hakim.

This ultimate form of persecution through punishment by corruption is unacceptable in a civilized society and undermines human dignity. (UN General Assembly, Moratorium on the Use of the Death Penalty, Resolution 62/149, Dec. 18, 2007; reaffirmed, Resolution 63/168, Dec. 18, 2008.) The interests of justice would best be served by the granting of a new trial to Abdul-Jalil al-Hakim and his family. The trial should fully comply with international standards of justice and should not allow for the reimposition of judicial, governmental and attorney corruption, fruad, misconduct, Islamophobia and Xenophobia.

It is noted with great interest that you both have stood for Government Transparency, Accountability, Civic Reform in cleaning up Government and Law Enforcement aimed at restoring public confidence in government, maintaining the Highest Ethical Standards, “Whistleblower's” Program, Legal Services aimed at improving conditions for the poor, initiated law suits against individuals and corporations allegedly causing harm to the public and environment, elder abuse, homeowner and tenant rights, the foreclosure and banking crisis, and violent crime as has Attorney General and candidate for Governor Jerry Brown, Oakland City Attorney John Russo, former Oakland and current San Leandro City Attorney Jayne Williams, former District Attorney Tom Orloff, and current District Attorney Nancy E. O'Malley.

It is noted with great interest the actions you have taken with regard to Senator Ted Stevens' conviction to assure that he not be denied his constitutional rights. You were specifically outraged by the fact that the prosecution withheld information critical to the defense's argument for acquittal, a violation clearly committed by the courts and defense in al-Hakim's case. Though not a US senator of great wealth and power, al-Hakim is a Black man revered around the world for his intelligence, courage, clarity, and commitment and deserves no less than Senator Stevens.

This case should be of real concern to everyone interested in justice. Sadly, al-Hakim's case was concluded in his absence amid the very racial cowardice of which you, yourself, have spoken.

This case should be of real concern to everyone interested in justice. Sadly, al-Hakim's case was concluded in his absence while he was at a previously approved court noticed leave for a funeral for the second death of an over 40 year friend that occurred during this trial amid the very racial cowardice of which you, yourself, have spoken.

Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. is known for, among other things, having said that "injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere" . Ignoring any instance of racism inside the courtroom leads to injustice that threatens us all.

There is no statute of limitations on the US Constitution and I therefore request that you do all within your power to review the totality of the circumstances as they are now known in 2010 in both cases of Abdul-Jalil al-Hakim and ensure that his Constitutional rights (in the form of racially-tinged and religiously motivated corruption, prosecutorial and judicial misconduct) were and are not abridged. The imperative for a civil rights investigation is clear and I specifically request that of your office.

Abdul-Jalil al-Hakim is prepared to meet with you or anyone you designate for the purpose of engaging in a dialogue on this matter and look forward to hearing from you soon.

Please accept this request within all applicable rules and regulations.

As the undersigned, I state for myself that I have willingly endorsed this petition with my signature that will be appended here based on the contact information I entered into this online form.

Cordially,

(Your signature will be appended here based on the contact information you enter in the online form and once you click on 'Sign Petition' it goes through immediately)