GESTIÓN DE SUPERSTAR

Firma esta petición ahora para oponerse a la corrupción, mala conducta gubernamental, judicial y de la Policía, la delincuencia de cuello blanco; laborales desleales y prácticas comerciales; Fraude al Consumidor, y mostrar su apoyo por la transparencia gubernamental, rendición de cuentas, la reforma cívica; Hacer cumplir las normas éticas, derechos civiles y religiosos ¡Libertad!

Petición a la Honorables Presidente Barack Hussein Obama II y Estados Unidos Fiscal General Eric Holder Jr. Himpton,

Al escribir tu nombre aquí está la colocación de su firma a esta petición (Obligatorio):

¿Quién le gustaría enviar su petición? Por favor, seleccione uno.
El Honorable Presidente Barack Hussein Obama II o el Honorable Fiscal General Eric Holder Jr. Himpton,? (Requerido)

El Honorable Presidente Barack Hussein Obama II El Honorable Fiscal General Eric Holder Himpton, Jr.

De: Tu nombre (obligatorio)

Ciudad donde vive (requerido)

Estado en que vive (requerido)

Su Código Postal (requerido)

Tu email (obligatorio)

Fecha de hoy (requerido)

Deseo enviar esta petición.

Para: El Honorable Presidente Barack Hussein Obama II
La Casa Blanca
1600 Pennsylvania Avenue
Washington, DC 20500

El Honorable Sr. Eric Holder Himpton, Jr.
Estados Unidos Procurador General
Estados Unidos Departamento de Justicia
Washington, DC 20500

cc: ONU Secy General Ban Ki-Moon, el Alto Comisionado para los Derechos Humanos la Sra. Navanethem Pillay, el presidente de las Naciones Unidas Consejo de Derechos Humanos el Sr. Martin Uhomoibhi Ihoeghian, El Senado de los Estados Unidos y de los Comités Judicial de la Cámara, y el Caucus Negro del Congreso

El Honorables Presidente Barack Hussein Obama II y el procurador general Eric Holder Jr. Himpton,:

YO, EL SUSCRITO, De conformidad con el espíritu de la Constitución de los Estados Unidos y la democracia libre, los ciudadanos ya registrados y calificados y los electores de los Estados Unidos de América, dirijo a usted con un sentimiento de profunda preocupación e indignación a la petición y solicitar su uso personal y la intervención inmediata para poner fin a una injusticia flagrante en el caso de Abdul-Jalil al-Hakim contra CSAA, el Condado de Alameda 811337-3 y el caso N º Abdul-Jalil al-Hakim v RESCATE Industries, Inc., Caso n . 821885-2.

Cualquier persona a quien ha oído hablar de este caso, leer los archivos del caso, informes de noticias, vídeos vistos y la información contenida y presentada en los casos, incluyendo informes y dictámenes de los tribunales, sabe que ambos ensayos Abdul-Jalil al-Hakim fueron procesados ​​y juzgados en medio la corrupción, el sensacionalismo y la histeria que, en su esencia, constituye un frenesí racial y persecución religiosa. Acusar a las palabras de los jueces, mientras que en el banquillo en los dos casos, ellos mismos, el punto con el racismo, los prejuicios y los prejuicios, incluso dentro de la sala.

Les pido que para el remedio de esta historia de 13 años de violaciónes graves de las leyes de los Estados constitucionales y normas internacionales de justicia como está documentado por muchos grupos legales de todo el mundo y para el Departamento de Justicia para iniciar de inmediato una investigación de derechos civiles para examinar los muchos ejemplos de la atroz y racista judicial, el abogado de la fiscalía, y la mala conducta corporativa que se remonta al rescate del ensayo original de Industrias en 2003 y continuando hasta el juicio CSAA finales de 2008, a la inacción actual del estado de Apelaciones de California y el Tribunal Supremo. El estatuto de limitaciones no deben ser un factor en este caso, ya que es una evidencia muy fuerte de una conspiración en curso para negar Abdul-Jalil sus derechos constitucionales.

El al-Hakim contra CSAA, y los casos de Industrias de rescate, son más de $ 20 millones, 13 años; contenciosos acciones legales, que tiene el archivo más grande de caso en la historia de la Corte Superior del Condado de Alameda, con más de 70 cajas de archivo de las memorias, más de 120 movimientos y respuestas; al-Hakim había más de 300 exposiciones de senderos, más de 5.000 páginas de pruebas, 3.000 páginas de documentos para el argumento de ensayo de réplica, 20 peritos, 77 de otros testigos, más de 100 páginas de las instrucciones al jurado, con la descalificación ha presentado en contra de cada juez de numerosos cargos de mala conducta judicial a la corrupción, en el que cada juez en este caso ha admitido el error, cometió perjurio, recusó a sí mismos, o las tres cosas!

Abdul-Jalil al-Hakim, uno muy conocido, gerente de negocios de éxito, el productor, y los musulmanes de los nativos ascendencia afroamericana de Oakland, California, presentó una demanda federal con los Estados Unidos Fiscal General del Departamento de Justicia, de un crimen de odio de la islamofobia y la xenofobia cometido en su contra por el Juez David C. Lee durante el juicio de Rescate de Industrias en la Corte Superior del Condado de Alameda, California.

This effort is to continue moving this investigation forward with charges of criminal extrinsic fraud upon the court of the State of California, spoliation of evidence, and the doctrine “unclean hands” against defendants/hostile intervener AAA Insurance; Ron Cook and the law firm of WILLOUGHBY, STUART & BENING; defense counsel Steve Barber and the law firm of Ropers Majeski; and Oakland City Attorney John Russo, Mark Morodomi, Randy Hall, Janie Wong, Anita Hong, Sophia Li, Demetruis Shelton, Elizabeth Allen, Erica Harrold, Michele Abney, Eliada Perez, former Oakland and current San Leandro City Attorney Jayne Williams and former Oakland City employee Pat Smith provided the case file to defendants Stephan Barber and Ron Cook for nearly a year and failed to notify the court of this unpardonable illegal breach in the chain of custody of the file, willful and intentional fabrication and authoring false evidence.

The Federal Complaint, drafted and filed by Abdul-Jalil in pro per, has broad based support from Democrats and Republicans, was submitted by Congresswoman Barbara Lee with the offices of Congressmen John Conyers, and Charles Rangel, has been review by several legal experts, with advocacy by former Republican Senator JC Watts, a client of al-Hakim's.

The Federal Complaint addressed the concern that a Superior Court Judges' conduct rose to the level of consideration for a Federal Crime and a Civil Rights violation because the bench upon which the judge rules is “under the color of law” and certainly the violation of anyone's civil rights is a federal crime. “Muslims, just as any other group, can not be afraid to speak up when their rights have been abridged. If one does not speak up, then the transgressions goes unreported and the perpetrator goes on to harm again unchecked, it does not matter whom the transgressor is” said al-Hakim.

The complaint, perhaps even more importantly, not only requested Merrily Friedlander, Chief of the Civil Rights Division, to make an investigation of a judicial hate crime, but also the many other civil rights and due process violations of judicial and prosecutorial misconduct, and attorney extrinsic fraud upon the court and law that are themselves directly the matters complained. JC Watts in asking “What does a supposed terrorist act in Russia have to do with the negligent contamination of a home in America?” posed the argument that there must be consideration of and a response to the many issues in the complaint.

After review in the USAG Office, the case was thought of as being so egregious that even the infamous Bradley Schlozman , whom is now fired and facing Federal indictment with resigned Attorneys General Alberto Gonzalez for removing Democratic attorneys from the US Attorneys Generals offices nationwide, sent al-Hakim a letter referring the matter (because of jurisdictional limitations) to the California State Attorney General, California State Bar Association, the California State Judicial Council, and California State Insurance Commissioner for investigation and prosecution. And these were Republican Judges and attorney's being complained of!

Pero eso no podría suceder. California Attorney General and candidate for Governor, Jerry Brown, responsible for carrying out the investigation of Oakland City Attorney John Russo, former Oakland and current San Leandro City Attorney Jayne Williams, former District Attorney Tom Orloff, current District Attorney Nancy E. O'Malley, Alameda County Superior Court, the State Appeals and Supreme Court judges, and various corporate defendants in this case is himself defending some of the criminals and covering up the very same corruption he is supposed to be investigating and prosecuting!

California Attorney General Jerry Brown, Oakland City Attorney John Russo, former Oakland and current San Leandro City Attorney Jayne Williams, former District Attorney Tom Orloff, and current District Attorney Nancy E. O'Malley, all claim to be proponents of Government Transparency, Accountability and Civic Reform and tout their campaign promises and accomplishments on TV and radio shows, in videos, on their websites, in numerous press releases and in the resultant news articles. To affect these lofty campaign promises, they all have paraded Civic Reform in cleaning up Government and Law Enforcement aimed at restoring public confidence in government, maintaining the Highest Ethical Standards, “Whistleblower's” Program, Legal Services aimed at improving conditions for the poor, initiated law suits against individuals and corporations allegedly causing harm to the public and environment, elder abuse, homeowner and tenant rights, the foreclosure and banking crisis, and violent crime.

They fashion themselves as independent watchdogs and gatekeepers for the people, fighting governmental and police misconduct and corruption, crime, nepotism, unfair employment practices, violent gangs, consumer fraud, unfair business practices, California's dysfunctional Health Care System, campaign disclosure and lobbyist activities.

According to Russo's Web site, Real Oakland Administrative Reform (ROAR) is designed to “make city government more accountable, more transparent and more effective.”

However, a closer inspection reveals that these are no more than hollow words to veil their Failed Campaign Promises; Brokers For White Collar Crime; Advocates of Racism, Bigotry, Selective Prosecution and White Class Priviledge!

Attorney General Jerry Brown, Oakland City Attorney John Russo, former Oakland and current San Leandro City Attorney Jayne Williams, former District Attorney Tom Orloff, and current District Attorney Nancy E. O'Malley's corporate lawsuits themselves amounts to little more than the same “shakedown” they oppose when they are sued.When they settle these pretentious suits they let the corporate offender off the hook for truly untold millions of dollars in fees, fines, penalties, restitution, sanctions, costs, actual and punitive damages and the proceeds NEVER go to the victim of these corporate crooks, The PUBLIC! Further, these corporate crooks are NEVER sent to jail for their White Collar crimes, yet most minority, immigrant, or religious minority violators are sent to prison with maximum sentences for alleged minor violations. Where is the equal enforcement, justice and even handed prosecution of alleged crimes? Why do Brown, Russo, Williams, Orloff, and O'Malley foster the apparent selective prosecution and litigation divide by race, money, class, sex, country of origin, religion? The public is being raped by these sleight-of-hand criminal litigation tactics of the corporate crooks, Brown, Russo, Williams, Orloff, and O'Malley while being mislead into believing that they are the “Protectors of The Public Trust!” as Russo states “that it is the government's job to conduct the peoples business on behalf of the people, accountable to the people, and in full view of the people.”

Oakland City Attorney John Russo and former Oakland and current San Leandro City Attorney Jayne Williams fabricated evidence and planted that evidence favorable to the defendants in the case files.

Al-Hakim también se ha producido recientemente clara, irrefutable, estableció "pistola humeante" pruebas de las continuas actividades ilegales flagrantes de la Ciudad de Oakland abogado John Russo, Oakland anterior y actual Procurador de la Ciudad de San Leandro Jayne Williams, el ex empleado de la ciudad de Oakland Pat Smith, abogado de la defensa Stephan Barber y el demandado Ron Cook en la CSAA y el caso de Rescate Rooter subyacente de que la Ciudad de Oakland abogado John Russo y la Oficina del Abogado de la Ciudad ha cometido fraude extrínseco, FRAUDE EN EL ESTADO, subordinación e SOLICITUD DE TESTIMONIO prejuicios, de proporcionar archivos LITIGIO caso y la evidencia a los Demandados, el expolio de las pruebas, fabricación de pruebas y plantar pruebas falsas en los expedientes de litigio, tratando de engañar al público en apoyo LITIGIO DE LA TEORÍA DE LOS ACUSADOS, ENGAÑO calumnia por dar a los expedientes del caso a la parte demandada Stephan Barber y otros de los cordeleros bufete de abogados, Majeski , y Ronald J. Cook, Willoughby Randy Stuart Alex, Bening Bradley y otros de la firma de abogados Willoughby, Stuart & Bening por casi un año, entonces es claro que construir pruebas fraudulentas fabricado en 1999 y que plantó pruebas favorables a los acusados ​​en los archivos Seis años después de que el caso fue cerrado, dedicada a la expoliación de la evidencia que queda en los archivos de la corte desde 1991, y promovió el testimonio de testigos sobre la base de esta evidencia plantada en el CSAA al-Hakim, v, y el caso de Rescue Rooter subyacente que se ha creado a través de FRAUDE extrínseca con el testimonio que acompaña adquiridos a través de admitidos sobornado y solicitó actos con prejuicios por John Russo y otros, que participan en las acciones para destruir el litigio del caso legal de al-Hakim, que participan en acciones de encubrimiento de sus actos ilegales, se comprometieron, con la complicidad de esta actividad delictiva con esta ruptura imperdonable en la cadena de custodia de los archivos de la corte para dar cabida a la estrategia de litigio los acusados, tanto en la CSAA y el caso de Raíz de Rescate subyacente.

John Russo, Morodomi Marcos, Sala de Randy, Janie Wong, de Hong Anita, Li Sofía, Shelton Demetruis, Elizabeth Allen, Erica Harrold, Abney Michele, Pérez Eliada y Oakland anterior y actual Procurador de la Ciudad de San Leandro Jayne Williams y el ex empleado de la ciudad de Oakland Pat Smith, acusados ​​Stephan Barber y Cook Ron han fracasado y se negó a proporcionar la información solicitada por al-Hakim, y además ha fallado y se negó a comparecer en la corte ordenó citación para declaración testimonial en dos ocasiones y en virtud de orden judicial citación para testimonio en el juicio y han causado al -Hakim y su familia para ser obligadas a abandonar sus $ 1 millón más en casa y la oficina, excluidos de un juego de la ley sobre $ 20 millones, y el negocio de varios millones de dólares para 13 años thru violación de los Abogados de la Ciudad de los de la empresa y los códigos profesionales, fraude extrínseco, el soborno de testimonio de prejuicios, de la comisión de estos actos bajo el manto de la ley con las manos sucias, y deben ser procesados ​​con todo el rigor de la ley.

John Russo, Oakland anterior y actual Procurador de la Ciudad de San Leandro Jayne Williams y violaciónes de los Oakland City personal de las oficinas del abogado de los penales en el Código Civil de negocios, y el Código de Profesiones, las Reglas de Conducta Profesional, y los cañones de California golpea en el corazón de al- fundamentales de Hakim derechos civiles y humanos y el derecho al debido proceso bajo la ley garantizada por los Estados Unidos Constitución y las enmiendas de la Constitución de California. Estas acciones califican como un crimen de odio en la Ley de Derechos Unruh, Ralph de Derechos Civiles y la Ley de Bane, mientras que son delitos claros de fanatismo religioso y la intolerancia, como tal, esta conducta se elevó al nivel de la consideración de un delito federal, y una violación de los derechos civiles ya la Oficina del Fiscal de la Ciudad de opera "bajo el manto de la ley" y, ciertamente, la violación de los derechos civiles de nadie es un delito federal. Esta privación de los derechos de al-Hakim procesos civiles, humanos y por el cuerpo de aplicación de la ley de la oficina de los Abogados de la Ciudad de Oakland de la subida del nivel de actividad criminal y "mala conducta de los agentes del orden locales y federales. Estas acciones criminales por parte de Russo y su equipo exigen que se emitió una citación ordenada por la corte a testificar.

Acción contra el ex Fiscal de Distrito del Condado de Alameda, Tom Orloff, actual fiscal de distrito Nancy E. O'Malley, y el Condado de Alameda del Departamento de Servicios de Manutención de Niños (ACDCSS)

al-Hakim tuvo que presentar una demanda contra el ex fiscal de distrito Tom Orloff y el Condado de Alameda del Distrito Fiscal (DA) y el Condado de Alameda del Departamento de Servicios de Manutención de Niños (ACDCSS), ya que desde hace más de 15 años que en repetidas ocasiones ha fallado y se negó a cumplir los propios tribunales órdenes para la aplicación justa y adecuada y la contabilidad de los pagos de al-Hakim hizo en la confianza de la DA en su calidad de fiduciaria para el menor al-Hakim, hijo privar al-Hakim, y el hijo menor de edad de más de 2.000 dólares de los dineros pagados. De este modo, el fiscal de distrito la creación de un "mítico" atraso y la cuenta abierta a nombre de al-Hakim, y en su nombre debe a la menor de edad, y cuando al-Hakim se negó a pagar su fraude como lo hace hoy en día, a continuación, cobran ilegalmente al-Hakim, con el delito de violación del estatuto manutención de los hijos por falta de pago, informando de la supuesta violación al Estado de California para la recolección y el Departamento de Vehículos Motorizados del Estado de suspensión de su privilegio de conducir por falta de pago e ilegal tirar al-Hakim en "prisión por deudas", la suspensión su licencia de conducir, la revocación de su pasaporte, y arruinar su crédito de varios millones. ACDCSS acciones y afirmó que "la derecha" para llevar a cabo de esta manera no se encuentran en ninguna ley estatal o federal, reglamento o acto legislativo sí y por lo tanto, no tienen la fuerza de la ley y hace que sea constitucionalmente inválidos y no oficial de la corte puede limitarse a "conceder" una sentencia a su favor para cubrir quedar atrapados haberlo hecho.

Estado de California, Jerry Brown, fiscal general y candidato a gobernador en sustitutos
El 22 de enero 2008 Procurador General de California Jerry Brown y la Oficina del Fiscal General del Estado de California, sustituido como abogado del expediente de este caso para el Departamento del Condado de Alameda de Servicios de Manutención de Niños supuestamente "En interés de la justicia". ¿Qué justicia es allí cuando él defendió entonces, oculta y por lo tanto más cómplice cometió el fraude admitido extrínseca deliberada e intencional al Estado, al-Hakim y su familia, y el tribunal, mala conducta del fiscal; persecución intencional y malicioso, mala conducta, conflicto de intereses , obstrucción de la justicia, la negación del debido proceso bajo la ley, la fabricación deliberada e intencional y las pruebas de autoría falsa; falsear y tergiversar las pruebas, falsedad y ocultación de hechos materiales, con conocimiento de la verdad con la intención de provocar el acto de la corte o de la confianza, el acoso ; e intimidación cometidos por el ex fiscal de distrito Tom Orloff, actual fiscal de distrito Nancy E. O'Malley, Lenahan Maureen, Harvey Valgeria, los consejeros L. Lavagetto, la Sra. K. Pendergrass, la señora Adler, Ferré Kris, y el contador del Sr. Lovelady y otras sin nombre en la oficina del fiscal del distrito; así como el abuso Comisionado Glenn Oleon de la discreción, la mala conducta intencional, conducta perjudicial, ilegales ex parte las comunicaciones y los prejuicios que dieron lugar a error.

During the appeal al-Hakim was forced to file a motion against Jerry Brown to augment the court record to include important transcripts of hearings that the DA admitted they had cheated the al-Hakim family. Despite the fact that al-Hakim had paid for the transcripts in advance, as with the motions that were “denied” because the appeals court did not rule on them in a timely manner, it also refused to augment the record on appeal when it was clear that the evidence would be harmful to the State and defendants Alameda County Department of Child Support Services (ACDCSS) and the Alameda County District Attorney(DA). The Appeals Court had discretion to take additional evidence on appeal (Code Civ. Proc., § 909.) where the proffered evidence demonstrates that the matter turns on the evidence tendered.

Alameda County Superior Court Judge Jon Tigar
Alameda County Judge Jon Tigar, visibly shaking and muttering, suffered a mental meltdown on the bench as he admitted in open court striking the Seventh Challenge For Cause, a scathing over 750 page indictment, without reading it moments after it was filed and served on him by al-Hakim in the court room on November 20, 2008!!!

After about 5 minutes of being unable to come up with anything, Tigar starts to meltdown babbling and muttering that “al-Hakim said that all the allegations in this challenge are the same as the previous ones, that he doesn't want to go through another challenge, he wants to make the ruling on the motions, and “although the appeals court may not agree, that he was striking the challenge without reading it”, al-Hakim can file a writ if he wants and if the appeals court agrees, then al-Hakim will get another hearing” . He then states that the order will be available after the hearing.

He then avoided, failed and refused to timely file and serve a written answer to the Challenge For Cause and proceeded to rule on the matters heard that moment and denied both al-Hakim's Motions to Vacate the Bereavement Order of April 7, 2008 and Trial Ending Minute Order of April 9, 2008 of unscrupulous Judge Tigar.

Judge Jon Tigar aborted critical witness testimony of The Honorable Judge Leo Dorado because he and Defense Counsel/ Defendants Stephan Barber and others of the law firm Ropers, Majeski, as well as Ronald J. Cook, Randy Willoughby, Alex Stuart, Bradley Bening and others of the law firm Willoughby, Stuart & Bening, feared al-Hakim would explore corruption, collusion, and misconduct of the Judges and lawyers reported to US Attorney General in the al-Hakim Cases!

Further, Tigar aborted the testimony of Co-Defense Counsel/Defendant Ron Cook yet al-Hakim still manage to get over 20 critical admissions of undeniable guilt of Stephan Barber and others of the law firm Ropers, Majeski, and Cook, Randy Willoughby, Alex Stuart, Bradley Bening. Tigar also libeled testimony and authored perjurious, deceptive, and fraudulent bereavement and trial ending orders to destroy the litigation of al-Hakim's legal case!

Judge Tigar's actions of "deliberate judicial dishonesty" are not only willfully and intentionally illegal, harmful, dangerous, libelous, perjurious, deceptive and fraudulent in violation of al-Hakim's civil and human rights and right to due process: they are insolent, offensive, insulting, and impugn the integrity of the court and he did this IN SUPPORT of the DEFENDANTS LITIGATION THEORY whom served as his own legal counsel in this very same case!

There is an infinite amount of evidence herein to attest to Tigar's lying under oath and perjury, misrepresentations, deceit, dishonesty, willful and prejudicial misconduct, bad faith, incompetence, conflicts of interest, bias, calling al-Hakim a liar without any substantiation or justification; instructing al-Hakim not to mention Tigar's perjury or to speak his own truth; threatened retaliation to charge him with contempt when al-Hakim refused to back off his charges of the judges perjury, deceit; entitling orders for his convenience to deny them and avoid appellate review; entitling orders for his convenience to deny them and issues sanctions; willfully and intentionally withholding filing and serving orders (possibly backdating orders) then acted on the orders after the applicable deadlines for al-Hakim to legally and properly respond, thus forcing al-Hakim to forfeit his civil rights and right to due process; irresponsible failure as a judge to read, interpret, and apply the applicable laws, accusing al-Hakim of attacking judges in open court, has attacked other parties in open court while dressed in civilian clothes yet performing his duties as a judge and his honest refusal to recuse “goes beyond mere negligence” ; this conduct falls into the category of willful misconduct by a judge as arising out of conduct which is done in bad faith and conduct prejudicial to the administration of justice that brings the judicial office into disrepute. The deception practiced by Judge Tigar during these events, as well as his specious actions before al-Hakim on every occasion, are equally antithetical to, and inherently incompatible with, his duties to uphold the law and the search for truth, reflects a gross lack of judicial temperament and a purpose other than the faithful discharge of judicial duty, and is at minimum improper action.

Al-Hakim se presenta claro, no controvertido, sin oposición, sin oposición, corroborada Tigar prueba ha escrito, firmado y presentado voluntariamente las órdenes de prejuicios, de engañosa y fraudulenta en el intento de engañar a la opinión pública en apoyo de sus resoluciones; y amenazada, y menospreció al-Hakim, hizo inadecuado referencias de carácter al-Hakim, y como un mentiroso, junto con su perjurio en relación con los asuntos de descubrimiento y la negación categórica de todos los temas descubrimiento planteó ante él por al-Hakim, refleja un prejuicio de las solicitudes de descubrimiento de al-Hakim, su caso y la falta de imparcialidad , respondió a su descalificación por su fracaso y el rechazo a la presentación de una respuesta oportuna, si lo hace 8 días más tarde, sólo después de al-Hakim había pedido a la respuesta por escrito al menos seis veces, la presentación de una respuesta 8 días más tarde, sólo después de al-Hakim, disputó su continua sentado en el caso e indicó su intención de presentar una apelación del mismo, declarando al-Hakim "ataca a los jueces" en su respuesta sin ningún tipo de explicación, llamando a al-Hakim, un mentiroso en su respuesta sin ningún tipo de sustancia; criticar públicamente al-Hakim en la corte en el expediente, en repetidas ocasiones mintió bajo juramento, hizo declaraciones falsas a sabiendas, en un esfuerzo para degradar, humillar y provocar el demandante, mientras que mentir bajo juramento y el perjurio, la deshonestidad, el engaño fraudulento, engaño calumnia; mala conducta intencional y perjudicial, el abuso de la discrecionalidad, negligencia, parcialidad , los prejuicios, falsas declaraciones, la incompetencia, el conflicto de intereses; de mala fe, la colusión, la negación del debido proceso, obstrucción de la justicia, el racismo, la intolerancia, ha expuesto, se expresa y se muestra una opinión fija de al-Hakim, favoritismo respecto de los acusados, hecho acusaciones falsas, acosados ​​al-Hakim, tiene deliberadamente, con engaño y temerariamente se entregó a una serie de actos y declaraciones ofensivas contra el demandante y ha mostrado desprecio, la malicia, y una actitud mental o disposición hacia al-Hakim, que prohíbe el derecho a un juicio justo ni juicio; no y se negó a responder a las alegaciones contenidas en los desafíos para la causa, conducta perjudicial, y abogó por un visto bueno judicial de la posición de la defensa eran motivo de descalificación bajo el Código de Procedimiento Civil. Proc. en el suelo de mala conducta, mala conducta perjudiciales, los prejuicios y los prejuicios en violaciónes del Código de Procedimiento Civil. Proc., Códigos de Negocios y Profesiones, las Reglas de Conducta Profesional, de la Const California., Del Código de California de los Cánones de Ética Judicial que violen los derechos civiles fundamentales de al-Hakim y el debido proceso bajo la ley garantizada por la Constitución de los Estados Unidos y que son aplicables a la el Estado de la Constitución de California como un "aborto involuntario de la justicia." persistente mala conducta intencional Juez Tigar, la mala fe, el maltrato, prometió represalias y "la atmósfera de la injusticia" determina que hay una alta probabilidad de que continuará con su comportamiento poco ético si se tratara de seguir en calidad de órgano judicial en el futuro.

Corte de Apelaciones de California
al-Hakim no ha tenido miedo, y muy correctamente, de modo que, como en el pasado, esta iniciativa de Apelaciones de California División de la Corte por los Jueces de Apelación Barbara Jones, James Richman, y Needham Henry con la cubierta y el santuario ofrecer por Ronald M. George, de la Corte Suprema de California y la cancha de los administradores de María Quílez y el Secretario de Diana Herbert había contratado y fueron directamente responsables de las negaciones y los despidos resultantes de sus acciones de apelación, ya que no actuaría sobre sus movimientos y se limitó a negar pura y simple o por no tomar una decisión hasta que la jurisdicción tiene correr y cualquier orden es "Tiempo de espera agotado". Él ha tenido esta Corte de Apelaciones de hacer esto dos veces, cuando se sabe que el tribunal la información solicitada se encuentra o aumentada para el registro fue fatal para la oposición, se les niega pura y simple o por no tomar una decisión hasta que la jurisdicción se ha ejecutado.

al-Hakim had requested the Appeals Court grant his request to supplement the record on Appeal and present evidence imperative to the establishment of Ron Cook, the law firm of Willoughby Stuart and Bening, CSAA and it's defense counsels Sean O'Halloran, Stephan Barber and the firm of Ropers Majeski as the hostile intervener in his underlying case against Rescue Industries and Bay Area Carpets, provided evidence that was procured thru admitted suborned and solicited perjurious testimony by them and the underlying defendants, their counsels and experts; engaged in actions to interfere with his legal case; engaged in actions to coverup the unlawful act of suborn and solicited perjurious testimony; committed fraud upon the court of the State of California; committed willful, criminal and corrupt perjury, fraud, conspiracy to commit fraud; fraudulent concealment by willfully and intentionally withholding their knowledge and insight of the intervention hearing and the transcript of said hearing; and allowed the trial to proceed knowing their responsibility and the legal impact; extrinsic fraud; spoliation of evidence; and qualify for the doctrine of unclean hands with the appropriate consequent sanctions and punishment upon them was denied with no explanation.

As these actions were taken against the State, the State has a vested interested in this matter not going forward in a fair and just manner , and is the basis for not providing al-Hakim with the clerks transcripts that were ordered and paid for; the ordered and paid for transcripts of the hearings to complete the record on appeal; denying the motions to Augment the Record on Appeal and for an Extension of Time to file the Opening Brief; and not ruling on the July 31, 2008 Motion for Reconsideration of the courts July 19, 2008 order denying al-Hakim requests to Augment the Record on Appeal and for an Extension of Time to file the Opening Brief; and finally- dismissing the case. This fact is apparent and resonates with inherent bias when Judge Alexander tells District Attorney Vangeria Harvey “It seems like what got us (the State) into this problem is: The wrong person got the money in the first place, at some point in time”.

Corruption and Collusion
These activities were done in concert with Oakland City Attorneys John Russo, Mark Morodomi, Randy Hall, Janie Wong, Anita Hong, Sophia Li, Demetruis Shelton, Elizabeth Allen, Erica Harrold, Michele Abney, Eliada Perez, and former Oakland and current San Leandro City Attorney Jayne Williams and former employee Pat Smith; Stephan Barber and others of the law firm Ropers, Majeski; Ronald J. Cook, Randy Willoughby, Alex Stuart, Bradley Bening and others of the law firm Willoughby, Stuart & Bening; William Jemmott now of the law firm Wilson Elser; Todd Jones and the law firm Archer Norris; Daniel Crowley of the law firm Daniel Crowley & Assoc.; Fletcher Alford, Joel K. Liberson and the law firm Gordon & Rees; Sean Robert O'Halloran now of the law firm Crone Rozynko; Anne Brooks Harrigan now of the law firm Grancell, Lebovitz, Stander, Barnes & Reubens; Yolanda Marnell Jackson now of the law firm Jackson Alternative Dispute Resolution; the law firm of Caven, Cleaveland, Murray; the former law firm of Jackson Harrigan; John Ratto and Dean K. Beyer, of ASU Group (formerly DL Glaze); defendants Rescue Rooter and Bay Area Carpet Cleaning; and retired Judges David Lee, Michael Ballachey, and Richard Hodge. Retired Judges Lee, Michael Ballachey, and Richard Hodge, though they live in three different counties, all coincidentally hired the same Oakland defense firm run by former Oakland and current San Leandro City Attorney Jayne Williams whom was responsible for providing the files to the defendants initially that was then given to her client Judge Lee for trial. There has been judiciary litigation support given by now Appellate Judges Barbara Jones, James Richman, and Henry Needham and Superior Court Judge Frank Roesch whom had disqualifications or complaints filed against them with cover and sanctuary provide by Ronald M. George of The California Supreme Court, Victoria Henley of The California Judicial Council, Ronald G. Overholt of The California Judges Association, The Alameda County Presiding Court Judge Yolanda Northridge and former Alameda County Presiding Court Judge George Hernandez that portrays corruption.

This onerous, odious taint and obvious complicity in quilt of these crimes makes it legally impossible for Brown to unbiasedly and practically investigate and prosecute the wrong doing of ALL the parties known to have committed these heinous, over 13 years of crimes against al-Hakim, his family, business, clients, community, and humanity as he himself defended the criminals and covered up the very same corruption he is supposed to be investigating and prosecuting!

La investigación debe seguir adelante
Theses are some of the myriad of reasons this matter is being referred back to Congressman John Conyers and the Judiciary Committee and to you, the United States Attorney General and the Department of Justice for complete investigation into the actions of the various Judges, court administration, State Attorney General, Alameda County District Attorney, Oakland City Attorney, various attorneys, defendants and their employees, agents, contractors, experts, and witnesses and the prosecution of the crimes against al-Hakim.

This ultimate form of persecution through punishment by corruption is unacceptable in a civilized society and undermines human dignity. (UN General Assembly, Moratorium on the Use of the Death Penalty, Resolution 62/149, Dec. 18, 2007; reaffirmed, Resolution 63/168, Dec. 18, 2008.) The interests of justice would best be served by the granting of a new trial to Abdul-Jalil al-Hakim and his family. The trial should fully comply with international standards of justice and should not allow for the reimposition of judicial, governmental and attorney corruption, fruad, misconduct, Islamophobia and Xenophobia.

It is noted with great interest that you both have stood for Government Transparency, Accountability, Civic Reform in cleaning up Government and Law Enforcement aimed at restoring public confidence in government, maintaining the Highest Ethical Standards, “Whistleblower's” Program, Legal Services aimed at improving conditions for the poor, initiated law suits against individuals and corporations allegedly causing harm to the public and environment, elder abuse, homeowner and tenant rights, the foreclosure and banking crisis, and violent crime as has Attorney General and candidate for Governor Jerry Brown, Oakland City Attorney John Russo, former Oakland and current San Leandro City Attorney Jayne Williams, former District Attorney Tom Orloff, and current District Attorney Nancy E. O'Malley.

It is noted with great interest the actions you have taken with regard to Senator Ted Stevens' conviction to assure that he not be denied his constitutional rights. You were specifically outraged by the fact that the prosecution withheld information critical to the defense's argument for acquittal, a violation clearly committed by the courts and defense in al-Hakim's case. Though not a US senator of great wealth and power, al-Hakim is a Black man revered around the world for his intelligence, courage, clarity, and commitment and deserves no less than Senator Stevens.

This case should be of real concern to everyone interested in justice. Sadly, al-Hakim's case was concluded in his absence amid the very racial cowardice of which you, yourself, have spoken.

This case should be of real concern to everyone interested in justice. Sadly, al-Hakim's case was concluded in his absence while he was at a previously approved court noticed leave for a funeral for the second death of an over 40 year friend that occurred during this trial amid the very racial cowardice of which you, yourself, have spoken.

Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. is known for, among other things, having said that "injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere" . Ignoring any instance of racism inside the courtroom leads to injustice that threatens us all.

There is no statute of limitations on the US Constitution and I therefore request that you do all within your power to review the totality of the circumstances as they are now known in 2010 in both cases of Abdul-Jalil al-Hakim and ensure that his Constitutional rights (in the form of racially-tinged and religiously motivated corruption, prosecutorial and judicial misconduct) were and are not abridged. The imperative for a civil rights investigation is clear and I specifically request that of your office.

Abdul-Jalil al-Hakim is prepared to meet with you or anyone you designate for the purpose of engaging in a dialogue on this matter and look forward to hearing from you soon.

Please accept this request within all applicable rules and regulations.

As the undersigned, I state for myself that I have willingly endorsed this petition with my signature that will be appended here based on the contact information I entered into this online form.

Cordially,

(Your signature will be appended here based on the contact information you enter in the online form and once you click on 'Sign Petition' it goes through immediately)