SUPERSTAR MANAGEMENT

Sign this petition NOW to stand against Corruption; Governmental, Legal and Police Misconduct; White Collar Crime; Unfair Employment and Business Practices; Consumer Fraud; and show YOUR SUPPORT for Government Transparency; Accountability; Civic Reform; Enforcing Ethical Standards; Civil Rights and Religious Freedom!

Petition To The Honorables President Barack Hussein Obama II and United States Attorney General Eric Himpton Holder, Jr.

By typing YOUR name here you are affixing YOUR Signature to this Petition (Required):

Who Would You Like to Send Your Petition To? Bitte wählen Sie eine.
The Honorable President Barack Hussein Obama II or The Honorable Attorney General Eric Himpton Holder, Jr.? (required)

The Honorable President Barack Hussein Obama II The Honorable Attorney General Eric Himpton Holder, Jr.

From: Your Name (required)

City You Live In (required)

State You Live In (required)

Your Zip Code (required)

Your Email (required)

Todays Date (required)

I Want to Submit This Petition.

To: The Honorable President Barack Hussein Obama II
Das Weiße Haus
1600 Pennsylvania Avenue
Washington, DC 20500

The Honorable Mr. Eric Himpton Holder, Jr.
United States Attorney General
United States Department of Justice
Washington, DC 20500

cc: UN Secy Gen Ban Ki-Moon, High Commissioner for Human Rights Ms. Navanethem Pillay, President of the United Nations Human Rights Council Mr. Martin Ihoeghian Uhomoibhi, The United States Senate and House Judiciary Committees, and The Congressional Black Caucus

The Honorables President Barack Hussein Obama II and Attorney General Eric Himpton Holder, Jr.:

I, THE UNDERSIGNED, Pursuant to the spirit of the United States Constitution and free democracy, as registered and qualified citizens and electors of the United States of America, am writing you with a sense of grave concern and outrage to petition you and request your personal and immediate intervention to put an end to an egregious injustice in the cases of Abdul-Jalil al-Hakim v. CSAA, Alameda County Case No. 811337-3 and Abdul-Jalil al-Hakim v. RESCUE INDUSTRIES, INC.,Case No. 821885-2.

Anyone whom has heard about this case, read the case files, news reports, viewed videos or information contained and filed in the cases including briefs and opinions of the Courts, knows that both of Abdul-Jalil al-Hakim's trials were tried and adjudicated amid corruption, sensationalism and hysteria that, at its core, constituted a racial frenzy and religious persecution. Indicting words from the Judges while on the bench in both cases, themselves, point to racism, bias and prejudice even inside the Courtroom.

I call on you for remedy of this 13 year history of gross violations of United States constitutional law and international standards of justice as documented by many legal groups around the world and for the Justice Department to immediately commence a civil rights investigation to examine the many examples of egregious and racist judicial, prosecutorial, attorney, and corporate misconduct dating back to the original Rescue Industries trial in 2003 and continuing through the CSAA trial ending in 2008 to the current inaction of the State of California Appeals and Supreme Courts. The statute of limitations should not be a factor in this case as there is very strong evidence of an ongoing conspiracy to deny Abdul-Jalil his constitutional rights.

The al-Hakim v. CSAA, and Rescue Industries cases, are both over $20 million, 13 year; contentious legal actions; that has the largest case file in the history of Alameda County Superior Court, with over 70 file boxes of pleadings; over 120 motions and responses; al-Hakim had over 300 trail exhibits; over 5,000 pages of exhibits; 3,000 pages of documents for trial rebuttal argument; 20 expert witnesses; 77 other witnesses; over 100 pages of jury instructions; with Disqualification's filed against EVERY Judge for numerous charges from judicial misconduct to corruption, where EVERY judge in this case has admitted error, committed perjury, recused themselves, or all three!

Abdul-Jalil al-Hakim, a very well known, successful business manager, producer, and Muslim of native African-American descent from Oakland, California, filed a Federal Complaint with the United States Attorney General, Department of Justice, of a hate crime of Islamophobia and Xenophobia committed against him by Judge David C. Lee during the Rescue Industries trial in Superior Court of Alameda County, California.

This effort is to continue moving this investigation forward with charges of criminal extrinsic fraud upon the court of the State of California, spoliation of evidence, and the doctrine “unclean hands” against defendants/hostile intervener AAA Insurance; Ron Cook and the law firm of WILLOUGHBY, STUART & BENING; defense counsel Steve Barber and the law firm of Ropers Majeski; and Oakland City Attorney John Russo, Mark Morodomi, Randy Hall, Janie Wong, Anita Hong, Sophia Li, Demetruis Shelton, Elizabeth Allen, Erica Harrold, Michele Abney, Eliada Perez, former Oakland and current San Leandro City Attorney Jayne Williams and former Oakland City employee Pat Smith provided the case file to defendants Stephan Barber and Ron Cook for nearly a year and failed to notify the court of this unpardonable illegal breach in the chain of custody of the file, willful and intentional fabrication and authoring false evidence.

The Federal Complaint, drafted and filed by Abdul-Jalil in pro per, has broad based support from Democrats and Republicans, was submitted by Congresswoman Barbara Lee with the offices of Congressmen John Conyers, and Charles Rangel, has been review by several legal experts, with advocacy by former Republican Senator JC Watts, a client of al-Hakim's.

The Federal Complaint addressed the concern that a Superior Court Judges' conduct rose to the level of consideration for a Federal Crime and a Civil Rights violation because the bench upon which the judge rules is “under the color of law” and certainly the violation of anyone's civil rights is a federal crime. “Muslims, just as any other group, can not be afraid to speak up when their rights have been abridged. If one does not speak up, then the transgressions goes unreported and the perpetrator goes on to harm again unchecked, it does not matter whom the transgressor is” said al-Hakim.

The complaint, perhaps even more importantly, not only requested Merrily Friedlander, Chief of the Civil Rights Division, to make an investigation of a judicial hate crime, but also the many other civil rights and due process violations of judicial and prosecutorial misconduct, and attorney extrinsic fraud upon the court and law that are themselves directly the matters complained. JC Watts in asking “What does a supposed terrorist act in Russia have to do with the negligent contamination of a home in America?” posed the argument that there must be consideration of and a response to the many issues in the complaint.

Nach Kritik in der USAG Office, wurde der Fall des als so ungeheuerlich, dass selbst der berüchtigte Bradley Schlozman, wem nun gefeuert und mit Blick Federal Anklage zurückgetreten Generalstaatsanwälte mit Alberto Gonzalez zum Entfernen Demokratischen Anwälte aus den US-Anwälte Generäle Niederlassungen bundesweit dachte, schickte al-Hakim ein Schreiben, in der Angelegenheit (möglicherweise auf gesetzliche Beschränkungen) an die California State Attorney General, der California State Bar Association, die California State Justizrat und California State Insurance Commissioner zur Untersuchung und Strafverfolgung. Und das waren republikanischen Richter und Staatsanwaltschaft als klagte über!

Aber das konnte nicht geschehen. Kalifornien Attorney General und Kandidat für Gouverneur Jerry Brown, zuständig für die Durchführung der Untersuchung von Oakland City Attorney John Russo, ehemaliger Oakland und San Leandro aktuellen City Attorney Jayne Williams, ehemaliger Staatsanwalt Tom Orloff, aktuelle Bezirksstaatsanwalt Nancy E. O'Malley , Alameda County Superior Court, den Staat appelliert und Richter des Obersten Gerichtshofs, und verschiedene Corporate Angeklagten in diesem Fall selbst zu verteidigen einige der Kriminellen und Vertuschung der selben Korruption er sein soll die Ermittlung und Verfolgung wird!

Kalifornien Generalstaatsanwalt Jerry Brown, Oakland City Attorney John Russo, ehemaliger Oakland und San Leandro aktuellen City Attorney Jayne Williams, ehemaliger Staatsanwalt Tom Orloff, und aktuelle Bezirksstaatsanwalt Nancy E. O'Malley, Anspruch auf alle Befürworter der Regierung Transparenz, Rechenschaftspflicht und Civic Reform und preisen ihre Wahlversprechen und die Leistungen in Fernsehen und Radio-Shows, in Videos, auf ihren Websites, in zahlreichen Presseveröffentlichungen und in den erhaltenen News-Artikel. Um diese hohen Wahlversprechen beeinflussen, sie alle haben Civic Reform bei der Säuberung vorgeführt Regierung und der Polizei auf die Wiederherstellung des öffentlichen Vertrauens in Regierung gerichtet, die Aufrechterhaltung der höchsten ethischen Standards, "Whistleblower" Programm, Legal Services zur Verbesserung der Bedingungen für die armen, initiierte Klagen gegen Privatpersonen und Unternehmen angeblich einen Schaden verursacht, der Öffentlichkeit und der Umwelt, Ältester Ziel Missbrauch, Hausbesitzer und Mieter Rechte, die Abschottung und Bankenkrise, und Gewaltkriminalität.

Sie gestalten sich als eigenständige Wach-und Gatekeeper für die Menschen, die Bekämpfung von Regierungs-und polizeiliches Fehlverhalten und Korruption, Kriminalität, Vetternwirtschaft, unfaire Beschäftigungspraktiken, gewalttätige Banden, Betrug am Verbraucher, unlautere Geschäftspraktiken, Kaliforniens dysfunktionalen Health Care System, Kampagne Offenlegung und Lobbyist Aktivitäten.

Laut Russo auf der Website wird Real Oakland Verwaltungsreform (ROAR) für die "Zubereitung Stadtregierung stärker zur Rechenschaft gezogen, transparenter und effizienter zu gestalten."

Allerdings zeigt ein genauerer Betrachtung, dass diese nicht mehr als hohle Worte, um ihre Schleier sind fehlgeschlagen Wahlversprechen; Broker für White Collar Crime; Befürworter der Rassismus, Fanatismus, selektiven Strafverfolgung und Weiß Priviledge Klasse!

Generalstaatsanwalt Jerry Brown, Oakland City Attorney John Russo, ehemaliger Oakland und San Leandro aktuellen City Attorney Jayne Williams, ehemaliger Staatsanwalt Tom Orloff, und aktuelle Bezirksstaatsanwalt Nancy E. O'Malley Corporate Gerichtsverfahren selbst ist kaum mehr als die gleiche "Shakedown "Sie widersprechen, wenn sie sued.When sie sich niederlassen diese prätentiös Anzüge ließen sie das Unternehmensnetzwerk Täter aus dem Schneider für wahrhaft unzählige Millionen von Dollar an Gebühren, Bußgelder, Geldstrafen, Wiedergutmachung werden, Sanktionen, Kosten, Ist-und Strafschadenersatz und die Erlöse gehen NIE an die Opfer von Konzern-Gangstern, die Öffentlichkeit! Ferner werden diese Gauner Corporate NIEMALS ins Gefängnis für ihre White Collar Verbrechen geschickt, doch die meisten Minderheiten, Einwanderer oder religiöse Minderheit Zuwiderhandlungen ins Gefängnis mit Höchststrafen für angebliche geringfügige Verstöße geschickt. Wo ist die einheitliche Durchsetzung, Gerechtigkeit und gerechter Strafverfolgung von mutmaßlichen Verbrechen? Warum tun Brown, Russo, Williams, Orloff, und O'Malley Foster die scheinbare selektive Strafverfolgung und Gerichtsverfahren Division durch Rasse, Geld, Klasse, Geschlecht, Herkunftsland, Religion? Die Öffentlichkeit wird durch diesen Taschenspielertrick Hand Criminal Litigation Taktik der Konzern-Gangstern, Brown, Russo, Williams, Orloff, und O'Malley, während sie in dem Glauben verleiten, dass sie die "Beschützer des öffentlichen Vertrauens werden vergewaltigt! "wie Russo," dass es die Aufgabe des Staates, um die Völker Geschäft im Namen des Volkes, dem Volk gegenüber rechenschaftspflichtig, und in den Augen der Menschen zu führen. "

Oakland City Attorney John Russo und ehemaliger Oakland und San Leandro aktuellen City Attorney Jayne Williams gefälschte Beweise und pflanzte diese Beweise günstig für die Angeklagten in den Akten.

al-Hakim hat auch vor kurzem klar, unwiderlegbar, etabliert "smoking gun" Beweise für die fortgesetzten eklatanten illegale Aktivitäten von Oakland City Attorney John Russo, ehemaliger Oakland und San Leandro aktuellen City Attorney Jayne Williams, ehemaliger Mitarbeiter Oakland City Pat Smith, Verteidiger produziert Stephan Barber und Beklagte Ron Cook in der CSAA und die zugrunde liegende Rettung Rooter Fall, dass Oakland City Attorney John Russo and the City Attorney 'Amt hat EXTERNEN Betrug begangen, BETRUG auf den Staat, Anstiftung und Solicitation VON Verleumden Zeugnis, BEREITSTELLEN Patentrechtsstreits Akten und Beweismittel den Beklagten, Beraubung EVIDENCE, Herstellung BEWEISMITTEL UND PFLANZGUT gefälschte Beweise im Rechtsstreit Case Files und versucht, die Öffentlichkeit in SUPPORT von Angeklagten LITIGATION THEORIE, Verleumdung BETRUG TÄUSCHEN, indem sie die Akten zu Beklagte Stephan Barber und andere der Anwaltskanzlei Ropers, Majeski und Ronald J. Cook, Randy Willoughby, Alex Stuart, Bradley Bening und andere von der Anwaltskanzlei Willoughby, Stuart & Bening für fast ein Jahr, dann eindeutig betrügerische gefälschte Beweise im Jahr 1999 gebaut und gepflanzt, dass Beweise günstig für die Angeklagten in den Dateien Sechs Jahre nach dem Fall wurde geschlossen, engagiert in Plünderung der restlichen Beweise in den Gerichtsakten von 1991; und gefördert Zeugenaussagen auf der Grundlage dieses gepflanzt Beweise in der al-Hakim v CSAA und dem zugrunde liegenden Fall die Rettung Rooter thru EXTERNEN BETRUG erstellt wurde mit begleitenden Aussagen beschafft thru zugelassen angestiftet und erbeten Verleumden Akten von John Russo und andere, engagiert sie sich in Aktionen, um den Rechtsstreit von juristischen Fall al-Hakim zu zerstören, sie engagiert in Aktionen zur Vertuschung ihrer widerrechtlichen Handlungen, die sie begingen, unterstützt und begünstigt diese kriminellen Aktivitäten mit dieser unverzeihliche Verletzung in der Kette der Verwahrung der Gerichtsakten, um die Angeklagten Rechtsstreitigkeiten Strategie sowohl in der CSAA und dem zugrunde liegenden Fall Rettung Rooter unterzubringen.

John Russo, Mark Morodomi, Randy Hall, Janie Wong, Anita Hong, Sophia Li, Demetruis Shelton, Elizabeth Allen, Erica Harrold, Michele Abney, Eljada Perez, und der ehemalige Oakland und San Leandro aktuellen City Attorney Jayne Williams und ehemalige Mitarbeiter Oakland City-PS Smith, haben Angeklagten Stephan Barber und Ron Cook alle gescheitert und weigerte sich, die Informationen, die von al-Hakim gesucht liefern, und weitere nicht und weigerte sich, unter Gericht erscheinen bestellt Vorladung zur Abscheidung Zeugnis zweimal und unter gerichtlich angeordnete Vorladung vor Gericht Zeugnis und verursacht haben, al -Hakim und Familie, von ihren 1.000.000 $ zuzüglich Hause und im Büro, von einem über 20 Millionen Dollar Klage ausgeschlossen, und Multi-Millionen-Geschäft für 13 Jahre durch die Stadt Anwälte 'Verletzung des Geschäfts-und Berufsordnungen, extrinsische Betrug, Anstiftung zur erzwungen werden Verleumden Zeugnis, begehen diese Taten unter dem Deckmantel des Gesetzes mit unreinen Händen, und sollte im vollen Umfang des Gesetzes verfolgt werden.

John Russo, ehemaliger Oakland und San Leandro aktuellen City Attorney Jayne Williams und die Oakland City Attorney Büro Stäbe "kriminelle Verletzungen des Bürgerlichen Gesetzbuches, Business and Professions Code, die beruflichen Regeln, und die Kanonen Kalifornien trifft den Kern von al- Hakims grundlegenden Bürger-und Menschenrechte und das Recht auf ein faires Verfahren nach dem Gesetz durch die Verfassung der Vereinigten Staaten und Änderungen der kalifornischen Verfassung garantiert. Diese Aktionen qualifizieren als ein Verbrechen aus Hass unter der Unruh Rights Act, der Ralph Civil Rights Act und den Bane Act, während sie klar Verbrechen der religiösen Bigotterie und Intoleranz sind, als solche, stieg dieses Verhalten auf das Niveau der Gegenleistung für eine Bundes-Kriminalität und ein Verstoß gegen Bürgerrechte, weil die Stadt-Staatsanwaltschaft arbeitet "unter dem Deckmantel des Gesetzes" und sicherlich die Verletzung von jedermann Bürgerrechte ist ein föderaler Verbrechen. Diese Aberkennung der bürgerlichen, menschlichen und ein faires Verfahren al-Hakim die Rechte von der Strafverfolgung Körper der Stadt Rechtsanwälte 'Büro von Oakland Anstieg auf das Niveau der kriminellen Aktivitäten und "Fehlverhalten von lokalen und föderalen Strafverfolgungsbehörden. Diese kriminellen Handlungen durch Russo und seine Mitarbeiter fordern sie ausgestellt werden gerichtlich angeordnete Vorladung zur Aussage.

Aktion gegen den ehemaligen Alameda County District Attorney Tom Orloff, aktuelle Bezirksstaatsanwalt Nancy E. O'Malley, und der Alameda County Department of Child Support Services (ACDCSS)

al-Hakim hatte eine Klage gegen den ehemaligen Staatsanwalt Tom Orloff und der Alameda County Staatsanwaltschaft (DA) und dem Alameda County Department of Child Support Services (ACDCSS) einreichen, weil seit über 15 Jahren sie scheiterten immer wieder und weigerte sich durchsetzen die Gerichte eigene Bestellungen für das faire und ordnungsgemäße Anwendung und Abrechnung von Zahlungen al-Hakim machte in Vertrauen auf die DA in ihre treuhänderisch für den Minderjährigen al-Hakim Kind berauben al-Hakim und das minderjährige Kind von über $ 2.000 von Geldern bezahlt. Dabei die DA die Schaffung eines "mythischen" arrearage und offene Rechnung in al-Hakim den Namen und in seinem Namen Verbindlichkeiten gegenüber dem minderjährigen Kind, und wenn al-Hakim, um ihre Betrügereien zu zahlen, als er bis zum heutigen Tag tut verweigert, dann illegal al-Hakim mit geladenen das Verbrechen der Verletzung des Kindes Unterstützung Statut für die Nichtzahlung, die Berichterstattung über die angebliche Verletzung des Bundesstaates Kalifornien für die Sammlung und das State Department of Motor Vehicles für die Aussetzung seiner treibende Privileg wegen Nichtzahlung und illegal warf al-Hakim in "Schuldner Gefängnis", Aussetzung seinen Führerschein, den Widerruf seines Passes sind, und ruiniert seine Multi-Millionen-Kredit. ACDCSS Aktionen und behauptete, "Recht" auf diese Weise nicht auszuführen in jedem Staat oder Bundesgesetz, Verordnung oder andere Rechtsetzungsakt und daher nicht über die Kraft des Gesetzes und macht es verfassungsrechtlich gebrechliche und kein Gericht Offizier kann nur "gewähren" eine Entscheidung zu ihren Gunsten zu decken erwischt zu werden, es getan.

US-Bundesstaat Kalifornien Generalstaatsanwalt Jerry Brown und Kandidat für den Gouverneur Stellvertreter in
Am 22. Januar 2008 ersetzt Kalifornien Generalstaatsanwalt Jerry Brown und das Büro des Generalstaatsanwalt des Bundesstaates Kalifornien in der Aufzeichnung als Anwalt in diesem Fall für die Alameda County Department of Child Support Services angeblich "im Interesse der Gerechtigkeit". Was Gerechtigkeit ist da, wenn er verteidigte dann, verborgen und somit der weitere complicitly verpflichtet die Zulassung vorsätzlich und absichtlich extrinsischen Betrug auf den Staat, al-Hakim und seine Familie, und die Gerichte, Staatsanwaltschaften Fehlverhalten, vorsätzliche und böswillige Strafverfolgung; Fehlverhalten, Interessenkonflikt ; Behinderung der Justiz; Verweigerung eines fairen Prozesses nach dem Recht; mutwillige und vorsätzliche Herstellung und Authoring falschen Beweisen; falsche Angaben und mischaracterizing Beweismitteln; Täuschung und Verschleierung von Tatsachen mit Erkenntnis der Wahrheit mit der Absicht, die gerichtliche Handlung oder das Vertrauen zu induzieren; Belästigung ; und Einschüchterung durch ehemalige Bezirksstaatsanwalt Tom Orloff, aktuelle DA von Nancy E. O'Malley, Maureen Lenahan, Valgeria Harvey, Berater L. Lavagetto, Frau K. Pendergrass, Frau Adler, Kris Ferre, und Buchhalter Mr. Lovelady verpflichtet und andere ungenannte im Büro des DS, sowie Kommissar Glenn Oleon den Missbrauch des Ermessens, vorsätzlichem Fehlverhalten, Handlungen zum Nachteil, illegale Ex-parte-Kommunikation und Voreingenommenheit, die in Fehler.

Während der Appell al-Hakim war gezwungen, einen Antrag gegen Jerry Brown, den Gerichtsakten zu erweitern, um wichtige Abschriften von Anhörungen, dass die DA zugelassen hatten sie die al-Hakim-Familie betrogen Include-Datei. Trotz der Tatsache, dass al-Hakim hatte für die Transkripte im Voraus bezahlt, als mit den Bewegungen, die "verweigert" wurden, weil das Berufungsgericht nicht über sie herrschen in einer fristgerechten Weise, sie weigerte sich auch, den Rekord im Berufungsverfahren zu erhöhen, wenn es klar, dass die Beweise wäre schädlich für den Staat und Angeklagten Alameda County Department of Child Support Services (ACDCSS) und dem Alameda County District Attorney (DA). Das Berufungsgericht hatte Ermessen zusätzliche Nachweise in der Berufung zu nehmen (Code Civ. Proc., § 909.), Wo die angebotenen Beweise zeigen, dass die Angelegenheit auf die Beweise angeboten wird.

Alameda County Superior Court Judge Jon Tigar
Alameda County Judge Jon Tigar, visibly shaking and muttering, suffered a mental meltdown on the bench as he admitted in open court striking the Seventh Challenge For Cause, a scathing over 750 page indictment, without reading it moments after it was filed and served on him by al-Hakim in the court room on November 20, 2008!!!

After about 5 minutes of being unable to come up with anything, Tigar starts to meltdown babbling and muttering that “al-Hakim said that all the allegations in this challenge are the same as the previous ones, that he doesn't want to go through another challenge, he wants to make the ruling on the motions, and “although the appeals court may not agree, that he was striking the challenge without reading it”, al-Hakim can file a writ if he wants and if the appeals court agrees, then al-Hakim will get another hearing” . He then states that the order will be available after the hearing.

He then avoided, failed and refused to timely file and serve a written answer to the Challenge For Cause and proceeded to rule on the matters heard that moment and denied both al-Hakim's Motions to Vacate the Bereavement Order of April 7, 2008 and Trial Ending Minute Order of April 9, 2008 of unscrupulous Judge Tigar.

Judge Jon Tigar aborted critical witness testimony of The Honorable Judge Leo Dorado because he and Defense Counsel/ Defendants Stephan Barber and others of the law firm Ropers, Majeski, as well as Ronald J. Cook, Randy Willoughby, Alex Stuart, Bradley Bening and others of the law firm Willoughby, Stuart & Bening, feared al-Hakim would explore corruption, collusion, and misconduct of the Judges and lawyers reported to US Attorney General in the al-Hakim Cases!

Further, Tigar aborted the testimony of Co-Defense Counsel/Defendant Ron Cook yet al-Hakim still manage to get over 20 critical admissions of undeniable guilt of Stephan Barber and others of the law firm Ropers, Majeski, and Cook, Randy Willoughby, Alex Stuart, Bradley Bening. Tigar also libeled testimony and authored perjurious, deceptive, and fraudulent bereavement and trial ending orders to destroy the litigation of al-Hakim's legal case!

Judge Tigar's actions of "deliberate judicial dishonesty" are not only willfully and intentionally illegal, harmful, dangerous, libelous, perjurious, deceptive and fraudulent in violation of al-Hakim's civil and human rights and right to due process: they are insolent, offensive, insulting, and impugn the integrity of the court and he did this IN SUPPORT of the DEFENDANTS LITIGATION THEORY whom served as his own legal counsel in this very same case!

Es gibt eine unendliche Anzahl von Beweisen hier verwendet, um Tigar lügt unter Eid und Meineid, Fälschungen, Betrug, Unehrlichkeit, eigensinnig und schädlich Fehlverhalten, Böswilligkeit, Inkompetenz, Interessenkonflikte, Voreingenommenheit, Aufruf al-Hakim einen Lügner ohne jede Begründung oder bestätigen Rechtfertigung; anweist al-Hakim nicht zu Tigar der Meineid zu erwähnen oder zu seiner eigenen Wahrheit zu sagen; drohte mit Vergeltung, ihn mit Verachtung, wenn al-Hakim sich zurückzuziehen seine Schützlinge der Richter Meineid, Betrug abgelehnt berechnen; berechtigen Aufträge für seine Bequemlichkeit, sie zu leugnen und zur Vermeidung von Berufungsverfahren; berechtigen Aufträge für seine Bequemlichkeit zu ihnen und Fragen Sanktionen verweigern; mutwillig und absichtlich Quellensteuer Einreichung und Servieren Bestellungen (möglicherweise Rückdatierung Bestellungen), dann handelte auf Befehl nach den geltenden Fristen für die al-Hakim, legal und richtig zu reagieren, damit forcing al-Hakim to forfeit his civil rights and right to due process; irresponsible failure as a judge to read, interpret, and apply the applicable laws, accusing al-Hakim of attacking judges in open court, has attacked other parties in open court while dressed in civilian clothes yet performing his duties as a judge and his honest refusal to recuse “goes beyond mere negligence” ; this conduct falls into the category of willful misconduct by a judge as arising out of conduct which is done in bad faith and conduct prejudicial to the administration of justice that brings the judicial office into disrepute. The deception practiced by Judge Tigar during these events, as well as his specious actions before al-Hakim on every occasion, are equally antithetical to, and inherently incompatible with, his duties to uphold the law and the search for truth, reflects a gross lack of judicial temperament and a purpose other than the faithful discharge of judicial duty, and is at minimum improper action.

al-Hakim presents clear, uncontroverted, unopposed, uncontested, corroborated proof Tigar has written, signed and submitted willfully perjurious, deceptive and fraudulent orders in attempting to deceive the public in support of his rulings; threatened, and belittled al-Hakim; made improper references of al-Hakim's character and as being untruthful; coupled with his perjury regarding the discovery matters and categorical denial of every discovery issue raised before him by al-Hakim reflected a prejudgment of al-Hakim's discovery claims, his case and a lack of impartiality; responded to his disqualification by his failure and refusal to timely filing an answer; doing so 8 days later only after al-Hakim had requested the written answer at least six times; filing an answer 8 days later only after al-Hakim contested his continued sitting in the case and indicated his intent to file an appeal for same; stating al-Hakim “attacks judges” in his answer without any explanation; calling al-Hakim a liar in his answer without any substance; publicly criticizing al-Hakim in court on the record; repeatedly lied under oath; made knowingly false statements in an effort to demean, humiliate and provoke plaintiff while lying under oath and perjury; dishonesty; fraudulent deception; calumny deceit; willful and prejudicial misconduct; abuse of discretion; negligence; bias; prejudice; misrepresentation; incompetence; conflict of interest; bad faith; collusion; denial of due process; obstruction of justice; racism; bigotry; has exhibited, expressed and shown a fixed opinion of al-Hakim; displayed favoritism towards the defendants; made false accusations; harassed al-Hakim; has willfully, deceitfully and recklessly indulged in a series of offensive acts and statements against plaintiff and has displayed disdain, malice, and a mental attitude or disposition toward al-Hakim that prohibits the right to a fair hearing or trial; failed and refused to respond to the allegations contained in the challenges for cause; conduct prejudicial; and advocated a judicial imprimatur of the defense's position were grounds for disqualification under Code Civ. Proc. on the ground of misconduct, prejudicial misconduct, bias, and prejudice in violations of Code Civ. Proc., Business and Professions Codes, the Rules of Professional Conduct, the California Const., the California Code of Judicial Ethics Canons that violates al-Hakim's fundamental civil rights and due process under the law guaranteed by the United States Constitution and as applicable to the State of California Constitution as a "miscarriage of justice." Judge Tigar's persistent willful misconduct, bad faith, mistreatment, promised retaliation and “atmosphere of unfairness” determines that there is a high probability he will continue his unethical behavior if he were to continue in a judicial capacity in the future.

California Appeals Court
al-Hakim has feared, and quite correctly so, that as in the past, this California Appeals Court Division lead by Appellate Judges Barbara Jones, James Richman, and Henry Needham with cover and sanctuary provide by Ronald M. George of The California Supreme Court, and court administrators Mary Quilez and Clerk Diana Herbert had engaged in and were directly responsible for the denials and resulting dismissals of his appeals actions as they would not act on his motions and merely deny them outright or by not making a ruling until it's jurisdiction has run and any order is “timed out” . He has had this Appeals court do this twice when it was known to the court the information sought to be found or augmented to the record was fatal to the opposition, they denied them outright or by not making a ruling until it's jurisdiction has run.

al-Hakim had requested the Appeals Court grant his request to supplement the record on Appeal and present evidence imperative to the establishment of Ron Cook, the law firm of Willoughby Stuart and Bening, CSAA and it's defense counsels Sean O'Halloran, Stephan Barber and the firm of Ropers Majeski as the hostile intervener in his underlying case against Rescue Industries and Bay Area Carpets, provided evidence that was procured thru admitted suborned and solicited perjurious testimony by them and the underlying defendants, their counsels and experts; engaged in actions to interfere with his legal case; engaged in actions to coverup the unlawful act of suborn and solicited perjurious testimony; committed fraud upon the court of the State of California; committed willful, criminal and corrupt perjury, fraud, conspiracy to commit fraud; fraudulent concealment by willfully and intentionally withholding their knowledge and insight of the intervention hearing and the transcript of said hearing; and allowed the trial to proceed knowing their responsibility and the legal impact; extrinsic fraud; spoliation of evidence; and qualify for the doctrine of unclean hands with the appropriate consequent sanctions and punishment upon them was denied with no explanation.

As these actions were taken against the State, the State has a vested interested in this matter not going forward in a fair and just manner , and is the basis for not providing al-Hakim with the clerks transcripts that were ordered and paid for; the ordered and paid for transcripts of the hearings to complete the record on appeal; denying the motions to Augment the Record on Appeal and for an Extension of Time to file the Opening Brief; and not ruling on the July 31, 2008 Motion for Reconsideration of the courts July 19, 2008 order denying al-Hakim requests to Augment the Record on Appeal and for an Extension of Time to file the Opening Brief; and finally- dismissing the case. This fact is apparent and resonates with inherent bias when Judge Alexander tells District Attorney Vangeria Harvey “It seems like what got us (the State) into this problem is: The wrong person got the money in the first place, at some point in time”.

Corruption and Collusion
These activities were done in concert with Oakland City Attorneys John Russo, Mark Morodomi, Randy Hall, Janie Wong, Anita Hong, Sophia Li, Demetruis Shelton, Elizabeth Allen, Erica Harrold, Michele Abney, Eliada Perez, and former Oakland and current San Leandro City Attorney Jayne Williams and former employee Pat Smith; Stephan Barber and others of the law firm Ropers, Majeski; Ronald J. Cook, Randy Willoughby, Alex Stuart, Bradley Bening and others of the law firm Willoughby, Stuart & Bening; William Jemmott now of the law firm Wilson Elser; Todd Jones and the law firm Archer Norris; Daniel Crowley of the law firm Daniel Crowley & Assoc.; Fletcher Alford, Joel K. Liberson and the law firm Gordon & Rees; Sean Robert O'Halloran now of the law firm Crone Rozynko; Anne Brooks Harrigan now of the law firm Grancell, Lebovitz, Stander, Barnes & Reubens; Yolanda Marnell Jackson now of the law firm Jackson Alternative Dispute Resolution; the law firm of Caven, Cleaveland, Murray; the former law firm of Jackson Harrigan; John Ratto and Dean K. Beyer, of ASU Group (formerly DL Glaze); defendants Rescue Rooter and Bay Area Carpet Cleaning; and retired Judges David Lee, Michael Ballachey, and Richard Hodge. Retired Judges Lee, Michael Ballachey, and Richard Hodge, though they live in three different counties, all coincidentally hired the same Oakland defense firm run by former Oakland and current San Leandro City Attorney Jayne Williams whom was responsible for providing the files to the defendants initially that was then given to her client Judge Lee for trial. There has been judiciary litigation support given by now Appellate Judges Barbara Jones, James Richman, and Henry Needham and Superior Court Judge Frank Roesch whom had disqualifications or complaints filed against them with cover and sanctuary provide by Ronald M. George of The California Supreme Court, Victoria Henley of The California Judicial Council, Ronald G. Overholt of The California Judges Association, The Alameda County Presiding Court Judge Yolanda Northridge and former Alameda County Presiding Court Judge George Hernandez that portrays corruption.

This onerous, odious taint and obvious complicity in quilt of these crimes makes it legally impossible for Brown to unbiasedly and practically investigate and prosecute the wrong doing of ALL the parties known to have committed these heinous, over 13 years of crimes against al-Hakim, his family, business, clients, community, and humanity as he himself defended the criminals and covered up the very same corruption he is supposed to be investigating and prosecuting!

Investigation Must Go Forward
Theses are some of the myriad of reasons this matter is being referred back to Congressman John Conyers and the Judiciary Committee and to you, the United States Attorney General and the Department of Justice for complete investigation into the actions of the various Judges, court administration, State Attorney General, Alameda County District Attorney, Oakland City Attorney, various attorneys, defendants and their employees, agents, contractors, experts, and witnesses and the prosecution of the crimes against al-Hakim.

This ultimate form of persecution through punishment by corruption is unacceptable in a civilized society and undermines human dignity. (UN General Assembly, Moratorium on the Use of the Death Penalty, Resolution 62/149, Dec. 18, 2007; reaffirmed, Resolution 63/168, Dec. 18, 2008.) The interests of justice would best be served by the granting of a new trial to Abdul-Jalil al-Hakim and his family. The trial should fully comply with international standards of justice and should not allow for the reimposition of judicial, governmental and attorney corruption, fruad, misconduct, Islamophobia and Xenophobia.

It is noted with great interest that you both have stood for Government Transparency, Accountability, Civic Reform in cleaning up Government and Law Enforcement aimed at restoring public confidence in government, maintaining the Highest Ethical Standards, “Whistleblower's” Program, Legal Services aimed at improving conditions for the poor, initiated law suits against individuals and corporations allegedly causing harm to the public and environment, elder abuse, homeowner and tenant rights, the foreclosure and banking crisis, and violent crime as has Attorney General and candidate for Governor Jerry Brown, Oakland City Attorney John Russo, former Oakland and current San Leandro City Attorney Jayne Williams, former District Attorney Tom Orloff, and current District Attorney Nancy E. O'Malley.

It is noted with great interest the actions you have taken with regard to Senator Ted Stevens' conviction to assure that he not be denied his constitutional rights. You were specifically outraged by the fact that the prosecution withheld information critical to the defense's argument for acquittal, a violation clearly committed by the courts and defense in al-Hakim's case. Though not a US senator of great wealth and power, al-Hakim is a Black man revered around the world for his intelligence, courage, clarity, and commitment and deserves no less than Senator Stevens.

This case should be of real concern to everyone interested in justice. Sadly, al-Hakim's case was concluded in his absence amid the very racial cowardice of which you, yourself, have spoken.

This case should be of real concern to everyone interested in justice. Sadly, al-Hakim's case was concluded in his absence while he was at a previously approved court noticed leave for a funeral for the second death of an over 40 year friend that occurred during this trial amid the very racial cowardice of which you, yourself, have spoken.

Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. is known for, among other things, having said that "injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere" . Ignoring any instance of racism inside the courtroom leads to injustice that threatens us all.

There is no statute of limitations on the US Constitution and I therefore request that you do all within your power to review the totality of the circumstances as they are now known in 2010 in both cases of Abdul-Jalil al-Hakim and ensure that his Constitutional rights (in the form of racially-tinged and religiously motivated corruption, prosecutorial and judicial misconduct) were and are not abridged. The imperative for a civil rights investigation is clear and I specifically request that of your office.

Abdul-Jalil al-Hakim is prepared to meet with you or anyone you designate for the purpose of engaging in a dialogue on this matter and look forward to hearing from you soon.

Please accept this request within all applicable rules and regulations.

As the undersigned, I state for myself that I have willingly endorsed this petition with my signature that will be appended here based on the contact information I entered into this online form.

Cordially,

(Your signature will be appended here based on the contact information you enter in the online form and once you click on 'Sign Petition' it goes through immediately)